<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6606315\x26blogName\x3dInappropriate+Content\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-6887164552313507372', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Hickville Dispatch©This is the latest e-mail from ...
Signs of the TimesMy boss reads the NYTimes and us...
Witty & Insightful©Today, political campaigns are ...
BTWCheck this out!
Beltway Blindness©Jason Zengerle over at TNR has c...
From the Hinterlands©The Library in Fleishmanns is...
Vacation. Sort of.I'm going to a small town in up...
Blinding Flash of the Obvious©Read this. Now. On...
Democracy in the Middle East, AlmostThe Washington...
Jeering the RepublicHere is The New Republic's res...
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006



Support Structure
Get Firefox!


 
Tuesday, April 27, 2004

My New Cynicism

Here's Noam Scheiber, on why Bush is showing good polling numbers despite bad news from, well, everywhere:

Dana Milbank hinted at an explanation in yesterday's Washington Post, in a piece about how Bush relies on "skillful use of languages and images" to keep the public behind the war effort. Reading the piece, you realize pretty quickly that what Milbank means by "skillful use" is really "dishonest use"--he lists several examples of the Bush administration shading the truth on Iraq, including the claim that the uprising there is the work of a "violent few," that a broad coalition of "other nations" are committed to our mission there, and that Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda. Milbank concludes with a quote from Duke University political scientist (and former Clinton NSC official) Peter Feaver, who argues that, "The rhetoric has to match the reality in Iraq, and if the situation on the ground deteriorates, then the administration will face an increasingly Herculean task keeping public support strong."

I think this is exactly right. The reason we're likely to get this critical-mass effect is that Americans tend to accept the claims of an administration at face value for a while. It's only after a military situation deteriorates to the point where the optimistic claims are so obviously out of line with what's happening on the ground--and we still haven't reached that point--that people are likely to reject the administration's line.

I don't share Scheiber's optimism. My own hunch is that a lot of American's harbored doubts about 'nam from day one, but only made a firm decision that the war was a mistake after the Tet offensive. While it is certainly possible that a lot of people harbor doubts about Iraq, I don't think any amount of news will change the minds of the people who supported this from the beginning: we're a very stubborn people. And there are a lot of people who ardently support the president in this misguided endeavor. I don't see Bush being hit by the drop in the polls Scheiber predicts. This election will be very, very, very close, and having to chose between Bush and Kerry is very, very, very sad.