<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6606315\x26blogName\x3dInappropriate+Content\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-6887164552313507372', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Offically No Longer an Interesting Blog
Unclear on the Concept
Publisher A©
Stealing Babies for Adoption
RIP Slobodan Milosovic
Publisher A
Hickville Dispatch©
Civil Service
Rising Sun©
Kakistocracy©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006



Support Structure
Get Firefox!


 
Monday, January 31, 2005
1000 Words©


I don't want to write about this today. The last war that was written about better than it was photographed was World War Two. The books Slaughterhouse Five and Williwaw are still better than any WWII movie ever made. Vietnam was sort of a tie: the unfortunately-titled book Chickenhawk is emotionally on about the same level as “Apocalypse Now”—but neither says as much as a photo of a little girl running down a street, of a man getting shot in the head, of one last helicopter lifting off. But nowadays, nothing written about the Gulf War, fiction or non, says as much about it as the film “Three Kings.”

In any case, here's to blue fingers.

Saturday, January 29, 2005
1000 Words©
I'm preparing to head out from West Virginia. I move to Washington, D.C. in just over two days.

It's been a good experience, all together. Excellent, in fact. One of the downsides of being a penniless student, unfortunately, is not being able to afford much film for my camera and certainly not being able to afford to upgrade to a good digital back for my SLR lenses. But I do have a little 640x480 digital camera in my phone. I feel like all I've got is a Poloroid. You see, up until they all started going digital, professional photogs would set up a shot and use a poloriod to make srue the lighting and subject all worked, then break out the expensive, high-quality film. So I have all these little shots that, if I had had a real camera, I could have turned into some excellent portraits. It's like being stuck with Carvaggio's sketchbook but none of the final works. (Not that I have a big ego, comparing myself to Carvaggio. We just share an interest in similar subject matter.)

Anyway, here's a few of the shots that almost became something really awesome:






I'll post more if I find time to play with FTP the next few days. For now, light posting as I pack up my stuff.

Thursday, January 27, 2005
The Medium Lobster
discusses Hillary Clinton's recent softening of her pro-choice positions in an apparent attempt to reach out to pro-life voters:
The Medium Lobster can only applaud [Sen. Clinton's] ingenuity and sharp-witted political calculation. Indeed, if there's any constituency that stands to warm to Senator Clinton, it has to be single issue pro-life conservatives, who are finally ready to embrace the senator after over a decade of believing her to be a radical Communist demon queen who murdered Vince Foster in cold blood to prevent him from telling the truth about her secret coven of lesbian witches.

Free Association Day
Two completely random facts, one sickeningly cynical, one sickeningly cute! For your enjoyment! Yay!


Something sickeningly cynical:

In the Bible, God doesn't just say that men are worth more than women—he provides a specific dollar amount! (Lev. 27:1-7) Thirty shekels, “after the shekel of sanctuary,” which is apparently some sort of cover charge to get into church. (Like the Scientologists have, only unlike scientologists, Protestants don't give you two beer tokens at the door.) Go Leviticus!


Something sickeningly cute:

A baby hippo nearly killed by the tsunami on the Kenyan coast has adopted a century-old male tortoise as it's new mommy. Awww.



Hat tip: Rachel

Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Snoopy Dance©
One of my favorite blogs is back! Rachel Lucas has returned, and is now the Blue Eyed Infidel. Here, she explains why I don't intend to have kids:
Sitcoms are so full of smart-assed kids that I am stunned that people still breed in this country. Have you watched that monstrosity they call "Quintuplets"? Is it canceled yet? What a godawful piece of nastiness. These kids go beyond smart-ass to downright smarmy and creepy, especially the smirking little f*cker who plays the runt. Who finds that crap funny? "Oh, it's so cute, he's always trying to get laid! So adorable, the way he lies to girls to see their boobies and get in their pants!" Everyone's always trying to figure out What's Wrong With Kids These Days, and the answer is right there: sitcoms featuring smart-assed little pricks.

I even hate smart-assed babies. There's a Quizno's ad out right now, wherein a six-month-old "speaks" with the voice of a scuzbag and leers at a hot chick, poolside. I hope the person who created that commercial has a bladder infection.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005
Foreign Affairs
Good news from Iraq, via the L.A. Times:
An expert bomb maker linked to some of Iraq's most sensational and deadly attacks — including strikes on the United Nations, the Jordanian Embassy and an Italian base — has been captured, Iraqi authorities said Monday.

The suspected bomber in custody, identified as Sami Mohammed Ali Said Jaaf — also known as Abu Umar Kurdi — was described in a government statement as "the most lethal" lieutenant of Abu Musab Zarqawi, the Jordanian militant whose group has claimed credit for numerous bombings, kidnappings and assassinations. ... Jaaf has admitted under interrogation to involvement in at least 32 car and truck bombings that together have killed hundreds, said Thair Nakib, a spokesman for interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. Jaaf has also told interrogators that he was involved in the torture and execution of an Iraqi human rights advocate, the spokesman said.
That's definitely good news. The downside, though, is that in a large movement like the insurgency, even a leader like Zarqawi is replaceable; there's a dozen more “lieutenants” just itching to take Jaaf's place.

The only real hopeful signs in Iraq are the elections. If — and it's possible — they go off well, then the Iraqis have a chance to really start taking responsibility for their country and controlling the insurgency. (Unfortunately, no matter how much it'd help, we're not leaving anytime soon.)

The Gold Man
Oscar nominations are out this morning. List of nominees here.

Mostly I've learned that I've missed out on too many movies this year. Yet another reason to be grateful for the upcoming move to D.C. Seven days, baby!

I will say that I hope Jamie Foxx wins supporting actor for "Collateral." It's unlikely, as he's also up for best actor in "Ray," and because it'd be unseemly to have someone win both, enough people will avoid voting for him that he won't win either. Shitty, especially because it means "Collateral" won't get anything. Action movies, like sci-fi, get short shrift at the Oscars, and it's often sad. Foxx was absolutely electric in "Collateral." Go see it.

W&I©
“Education would be much more effective if it's purpose were to ensure that by the time they leave school, every student should know how much they don't know, and be imbued with a lifelong desire to know it.”

—Sir William Haley

Monday, January 24, 2005
50 in '05©
Number Three:
Star Trek: The Next Generation:
Q-Squared

By Peter David


So I had a crappy saturday night, for reasons that are both uninteresting and unpublishable. Now most well-adjusted people have a little ritual they perform when they need to recover from a night like that. Some people go on their favorite hike, some people get a manicure, at least one late-ninteenth century President had people secretly shot.

I read this book.

Non-trekkers won't get it, of course: nearly five hundred pages of fast, funny prose that requires a thorough education in all things Trek to comprehend on even a basic level. But having read this book about a dozen times before, I can get through all of it in a mere few hours, and it never fails to make me feel better.

Peter David's blog is probably the only site that's been on my blogroll since day one here, and I check it out every time I'm blogging, as it (along with Dan Savage) provides a nice break from politics. That's what David does best: a break from reality. Not bad-action movie, wouldn't-it-be-cool-if-we-could-shoot-everyone? escapism, but the sort of step back and look at things in perspective escapism that is essiential for the best storytellers.

A Fond Farewell
William Safire, one of the best minds on the right (or anywhere) is—well, he'd hate for me to say “retire.” As he explains:
The Nobel laureate James Watson, who started a revolution in science as co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, put it to me straight a couple of years ago: "Never retire. Your brain needs exercise or it will atrophy."

Why, then, am I bidding Op-Ed readers farewell today after more than 3,000 columns? Nobody pushed me; at 75, I'm in good shape, not afflicted with political ennui; and my recent column about tsunami injustice and the Book of Job drew the biggest mail response in 32 years of pounding out punditry.

Here's why I'm outta here: In an interview 50 years before, the aging adman Bruce Barton told me something like Watson's advice about the need to keep trying something new, which I punched up into "When you're through changing, you're through." He gladly adopted the aphorism, which I've been attributing to him ever since.

Combine those two bits of counsel - never retire, but plan to change your career to keep your synapses snapping - and you can see the path I'm now taking...
He'll be assuming the chairmanship of the Dana Alliance for Brain Initiaves, a group devoted to the advancement of brain study and science. Given the state of the union, it's comforting to see someone taking an interest in improving our collective brains—and a pity to lose one as fine as Safire's to it.

Sunday, January 23, 2005
Sponge Bob Queer Pants
So I'm not sure if this should be a “C&R©” post, or a “Kakistokracy©” or what. In fact, I think I should just have a “How Crazy Is James Dobson, Anyway?©” category. According to Dr. Dobson, the latest weapon unleashed by the communist, homosexual and evil group the Secret Assembly To Annul Normalcy is
the cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants.

"Does anybody here know SpongeBob?" Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, asked the guests Tuesday night at a black-tie dinner for members of Congress and political allies to celebrate the election results.
The article makes a valiant attempt to explain Dr. Dobson's evidence that SpongeBob has malicious intentions. It's a difficult task that eventually sends an otherwise reputable reporter* spiraling into a land where the involvement of a man who wrote the song “We Are Family” in a group that produced a video in which SpongeBob appears and which also has on it's website a “tolerance pledge” that mentions the words “sexual identity” and is, tellingly, similar in name and web address to a Charleston, S.C. based gay youth support group that is also named “We Are Family”, thus proving that SpongeBob SquarePants is an agent of the enemies of the people that I, Lyndon LaRouch, have been fighting to expose for lo, these many years.

Hat tip: Christiana.
*or as reputable as a New York Times reporter can get, anyway.

Thursday, January 20, 2005
Missing the Big Day
Today I will do some schoolwork (and by schoolwork, I mean write this) and recover from the shocking news that Laura Bush enjoys E.B. White's essays just as much as I do. (Yes, the one who wrote for the New Yorker and was a Manhattan Liberal until he moved to a farm and became a Crabapple Cove, Maine, Liberal.)

Actually, I wish more people would read the opposing sides. I have a book by an anti-choice activist on my table right now. And—unlike her husband—the First Lady once had a real job. I got to know a small town librarian when I worked in Fleishmanns, New York, and they rock my socks. So points to Laura Bush

What I would like to be doing today is be part of the inauguration Day events:

Of the nine separate inaugural balls (mostly organized by state) I would have liked to go “the Freedom Ball.” It would be interesting to see what people from Alabama, Michigan and Alaska have in common. But mostly, it would have been cool to see Union Station used for a dance.

I would have liked to have been at Sen. Rick Santorum's (R-PA) morning media event, to see just what's up with Santorum. (Santorum's re-election is deeply contested, thanks to his assertion that consensual sex in private is not protected by the Constitution and that legalizing homosexual sex would lead to incest and beastiality. Dan Savage is shepherding a campaign to rename ‘scat’—the somewhat frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex—after the senator. Santorum is part of the Bush campaign's “wictory” on-line fundraising efforts, which encourages bloggers to ask for donations to a republican candidate every Wednesday.)

I would of course have liked to see Bush's inaugural address. But from noon to one, I will have too little access to computers and too much access to undercooked, poor quality lunch. (Provided to our center via a contract with the Department of Defense for reasons not even our finance wizard can penetrate.) I'll have to read the text later tonight.

I would have liked to see Billionaires for Bush's auction of Social Security and ANWR and their Re-Coronation inaugural Ball at 8:30 tonight. Oh, and I've just read that Laura Bush has read the complete works of Truman Capote. Inexcusable—doesn't she know he's just another of the dozens of authors writing in the 50's who weren't as good as Gore Vidal? Williams, Burroughs, Ginsberg...but I digress.

The one thing today I hate missing out on more than any other will be Leiberman's interview on “The Daily Show” today. I mean, there's an inauguration every four years—how often does Joe Leiberman appear on TV with a Jew?

C&R©
The New York Times has new numbers. Some highlights:
  • Bush received only a two point bump in approval after winning the election. Historically, that's small. For reasons that I cannot explain (and are probably depressing as all hell) when you win an election, it makes people want to vote for you.

  • The Times did not poll Bush above 51% at any single point in 2004. Both these drive home the point that a better candidate could have won.

  • Bush's approval numbers drop significantly when voters are asked about specific issues. Foreign policy? 42% approval. Economy, also 42%; Iraq, 40%. The only issues voters believe Bush is handling well are terrorism (56%) and our response to the Tsunami (81%). The importance, then, of “image” simply cannot be understated. Voters respond to vague, non-specific “connection” with a candidate than they do with actual, specific experience or performance.

  • When the question is changed to include “undecided” in the prompted response, Bush's approval-disapproval drops to 44-40—and 14% undecided. Even going right into the most media-saturated election history, 8% still said they were undecided. So apparently 8% of Americans live in deliberate ignorance. Coincidentally, that's about the same number of Americans that miss “Donny & Marie.”

  • Thanks to the way history is taught, many Americans have difficulty linking specific events to specific causes. When asked if the think subject X will be better or worse off at the end of President Bush's second term, most of the questions got better than 45% saying, “about the same.” People have a hard time believing that politicians actually do things that affect them.

  • Predictable exceptions: 66% of voters think we'll be running a higher national debt in four years, and only 9% of voters think that their federal taxes will go down under Mr. Rebate. That would be the 8% who live in deliberate ignorance plus 1% who are crazy.

  • Notable exception: 75% of voters expect a significant number of American troops in Iraq in four years. They get something that a former senior staffer in the W. Va. State GOP was explaining to be at a Taco Bell last week: “We need somewhere in the middle east to park our army. The king of Saudi Arabia is old and has no heir designated. After he dies, civil war is a real possibility. We were building permanent army bases in Iraq before we reached Baghdad.”

  • The number of Americans opposed to abortion is the largest it's been since the poll started tracking in 1989. But that's only 26%. Only 36% are pro-choice. The number in the middle (legal but strictly regulated) is 35%. Abortion battles are won by whichever movement gets the votes from that group.

  • Demonstrating a firm grasp of the blindingly obvious, 78% of voters believe it is “not possible to overhaul Social Security, cut taxes and pay for the war in Iraq all at the same time without increasing the budget deficit.”

  • 49% of voters approve of the GOP. 51% approve of the Dems. Now, I can understand having the same feeling for both parties. I just don't understand how that feeling can be positive.

  • When you ask how congress is doing it's job, the Don't-Knows jump into the double digits: 17% this month. “Why do I have to know about congress? I thought the President was the king of democracy!”

Wednesday, January 19, 2005
W. Va.
My teacher just asked me what Chlamydia is.

I told him it's a disease that's common in some third-world countries.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005
50 in '05©
Number Three:
Red Dwarf:
Better Than Life

By Grant Naylor


When we left David Lister, he had gone from Saturn to Deep Space to Bedford Falls. Now he must fight vicious polymorphs, travel through a black hole, and play pool with planets, and eventually fulfill his destiny and become King of the Cockroaches.

An excerpt:

Back in the twenty-first century, as robotic life became more and more sophisticated, it was generally accepted that something was needed to keep the droids in check. For the most part they were stronger, and often more intelligent, than human beings: why should they submit to second-class status, to a lifetime of drudgery and service?

Many of them didn't. Many of them rebelled.

Then it occurred to a bright young systems analyst at Android International that the best way to keep the robots subdued was to give them religion.

Hallelujah!

The concept of Silicon Heaven was born. A belief chip was implanted into every droid that now came off the production line.

The concept ran thus: if machines served their human masters with diligence and dedication, they would attain everlasting life in mechanical paradise when their components finally ran down. In Silicon Heaven, they would be reunited with their electronic loved ones. It was a place where the hard drive never crashed, the laser printer always had enough toner and the photocopier never had a paper jam.

At last they had solace. They were every bit as exploited as they'd always been, but now they believed there was some kind of justice at the end of it all.

Friday, January 14, 2005
Long Weekend—
Well, it's a long weekend and I'll be taking it off from blogging and The Bar and quite a bit else as well. A friend of mine and I in D.C. are finally getting it together on a screenplay we've been almost writing together for months now. And I'm going to attempt an essay on atheism, inspired by an old post here, a blog by some young conservatives. (Hat tip: Quilly)

Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, y'all. See you on Tuesday!

50 in '05©
Number Two:
Red Dwarf:
Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers

By Grant Naylor


Grant Naylor is a gestalt entity with two bodies: Rob Grant and Doug Naylor, the co-creators of the British comedy Red Dwarf. It's a re-read, but I was reading it before I began this challenge, so it totally counts. Here's a brief excerpt, from part 1: “Your own death, and how to cope with it”—
Lister had beentrying to get off Mimas for nearly six months now. How he'd got there was still something of a mystery.

The last thing he really remembered with any decent clarity was celebrating his birthday back on Earth. He, and six of his very closest friends, decided to usher in his twenty-fifth year by going on a Monopoly board pub-crawl around London. A drink at each of the squares. In Whitechapel they had pina coladas. King's Cross station, double vodka. In Euston Road, pints of Guinness. The Angel Islington, mezcals. Pentonville Road, bitter laced with rum and blackcurrant. And they continued around the board. By the time they'd got to Oxford Street, only four of them remained. And only two of the four still had the power of speech.

His last real memory was of telling the others he was going to buy a Monopoly board, because no one could remember what the next square was, and stepping out into the cold night air clutching two-thirds of a bottle of sake.

He'd woken up slumped across a table in a McDonald's burger bar on Mimas, wearing a lady's pink crimplene hat and a pair of yellow fishing waders, with no money and a passport in the name of ‘Emily Berkenstein.’ What was more, he had a worrying rash.

He was broke, diseased and 793 million miles from Liverpool.


By part 2, “Alone in a Godless universe, and out of Shake‘n’Vac,” Lister is the last human being alive and 3 million years from Earth. By part 3, he lives in Bedford Falls, the from the movie It's a Wonderful Life.

Now I'm on the second book in the series—Better Than Life—and it's getting a bit odd.

Thursday, January 13, 2005
50 in '05©
So I've run across several mentions of the Fifty Book Challenge. Christiana is taking part, along with several of her friends. The general idea, apparently, is to read fifty books this year and be able to list them at the end. Seems like an excellent idea. One guy posted his list of rules but it's really up to everyone to decide. Here's my rules:
  1. I will read the entire book.
  2. I won't read a book just because I need something on the list.
  3. Wash your hands before you eat, not after.
  4. I will put up the title and a paragraph or two when I'm done.



Number one:
The Last Madam
By Christine Wiltz

You have to love New Orleans. I was only there once, on a school trip. In the short three hours Paul and I were actually trying to have fun, we managed to play pool in a French Quarter bar with a Marine from Texas, an accountant from Philly and a hippy chick from—you guessed it—Berkeley.

Well, that's just a shadow of what the French Quarter used to be. Norma Wallace was a Madame in New Orleans for nearly forty years, hosting mayors, senators and even John Wayne. She was involved with (or even married) one of Al Capone's men, with one of the most successful club owners in the city, with a high-ranking police official and, when she was in her sixties, she married a twenty-four year old whom she had deflowered when he was just fourteen. After she was finally busted in the early sixties, she was given just six weeks, probation and, a couple of years later, keys to the city.

So you gotta love New Orleans.

Wednesday, January 12, 2005
C&R©
The New York Times reports today:
The top American weapons inspector in Iraq, Charles A. Duelfer, has wrapped up his work there, a step that ends the search for illicit weapons, an intelligence official said Tuesday night.

Mr. Duelfer issued a comprehensive report last fall that acknowledged that Iraq had destroyed its chemical and biological weapons in the early 1990's, years before the American invasion of 2003. But Mr. Duelfer returned to Iraq for further investigations after that report was issued. In an article in its Wednesday issue, The Washington Post reported that he had ended that work in late December.

The intelligence official said that Mr. Duelfer was still likely to issue several small additional statements on his findings, but that none would contradict the central conclusions that Iraq did not possess illicit weapons at the time of the American invasion.

President Bush and his top advisers had described what they said were illicit Iraqi arsenals as the central justification for going to war.

Mr. Duelfer, an adviser to the director of central intelligence, had overseen the work of the Iraq Survey Group, a 1,200-member military organization that carried out the work of searching for weapons, interviewing Iraqi officials and drawing up assessments.

That team remains in Iraq, but the main focus of its work shifted several months ago to efforts to combat the anti-American insurgency there.
So the demise of “the central justification for going to war” merits only six short paragraphs in the back of the A section. Some of the headlines that were father up the front page include:But the really unfortunate thing is the above-the-fold front page coverage of the testimony of former Abu Gharib detainees. This is a
C&R story: controversy and ratings. Now, the liberal bias in the media is much discussed at The Bar. The conservatives often claim that the media help democrats and liberals. Well, if this is “helping,” I think I'd prefer to be smeared.

Look: in the back of the A section is a measly six paragraphs that report on the fact that the very agency Bush created to find WMD's in Iraq has found nothing, and admitted that “Iraq had destroyed its chemical and biological weapons in the early 1990's, years before the American invasion of 2003.” And now “the central justification for going to war” has been shown to be complete and utter bullshit, just like we've been saying all this time, and it's getting buried in the back of the A section! They didn't even bother getting the White House to try and spin this, because that would have eaten up valuable column inches that could be spent on Abu Gharib, which is something that President Bush's Secretary of Defense may be somewhat responsible for allowing to happen.

Well, I guess the readers of the New York Times needed their daily fix of simple, easy to digest tales of blood and suffering more than they needed anything that has to do with the repeated, substantive policy failures of the Bush administration. The problem with the media is not liberal bias. It's our national C&R addiction.

If it bleeds, it leads.

Tuesday, January 11, 2005
Rated #1 In Customer Satisfaction
My father left a comment yesterday asking me to call home. Just in case anyone else has tried to contact me recently, here's what's up:
  • Number of cell phones in my possession: 2
  • Number of cell phones able to make or receive calls: 0.
  • Days since I made a phone call: 2
  • Days since I checked my voice mail: 3
  • Time spent on hold with Sprint PCS tech support: approx. 1.5 hours
  • Time spent talking with a real person with Sprint PCS tech support: approx. 25 minutes.
  • Times disconnected from Sprint PCS tech support representative: 2
  • Times disconnected from Sprint PCS by automated system: 5
  • Problems solved by Sprint PCS tech support: 1
  • Problems created by Sprint PCS tech support: 4
  • Money refunded or credited to my account by Sprint PCS tech support: $0
  • Number of Sprint PCS call center supervisors who's people skills entitled them to be civilly and politely informed of all the activities I was missing out on because of the time I spent on hold, in intimate detail, including comprehensive explanation of various anatomical requirements (and specifications thereof, in metric measurements) and with unpublishable corroborating testimony from my roommate: 1

Kakistocracy©
So today Reuters reports:
The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear a constitutional challenge to a 1977 Florida law that bans gays and lesbians from adopting children, the only such state law in the nation.
Agape Press covers the reaction:
According to [Mathew] Staver [of Liberty Council], with this decision, the nation's highest court has come down on the side of traditional families: "but not only that—I think other states will follow Florida's lead to enact similar laws."
On the morning of June 22nd, 1633, Galileo was found guilty of holding a false doctrine. He swore never to argue such doctrines again, and no one ever again questioned that the sun rotates around the earth.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005
Something Uplifting (Subscription Only)
It's actually quite awesome. Follow the link to the NYTimes below. Ignore the article (Colin Powell thinks tsunamis that kill hundreds of thousands of people are horrible) and go to the ‘Multimedia’ section of the sidebar. Click the link—I'm sorry I can't find a faster way to do this—that says ‘A Disaster Unfolds.’ It's a flash presentation with an animation tracking the wave, and photos and such. Go to the ‘Photos: Response’ section and then the ‘Aid Picture’ button. You'll see a slide show of people from dozens of countries doing everything from collecting blankets to putting S&R helicopters in the air. All to help people who are suffering.

The New York Times

My favorite picture is of a volunteers of the Pakistani Edhi Foundation packing medicine for victims. Any other time you'd see a photo of a Pakistani man in the New York Times, it wouldn't be this. But this is how most people live: normal, regular folks who want to live in peace and will even take time out of their day to help those who are suffering thousands of miles away. We can't let a few maniacs with box-cutters make us forget how much we have in common.

When you've done that, go check out the Network for Good to see what you can do to help. (Hat Tip: Quilly)

From the Bar©
A barfly who shall remain anonymous recently said something along the lines of “liberals, you know, have no original thoughts. They simply parrot the soundbites of their gurus. Makes it hard to tell them apart, eh?”

It was a silly little aside—not at all reflective of an otherwise very intelligent man, which is why I won't use his name—but it did set me off on the following rant...

The left, as in mainstream liberals, have no original thoughts. No mainstream politician has original ideas. Our system is structured that way. Optimists know it's been that way since 1791, pessimists know it's been that way since 1798.

A two-party system is structured to keep original thought out of mainstream politics as much as possible. In a horse race with two contestants, you do not win by having original thoughts. You win by adopting the thinking that pleases the majority.

It is a conservative system in the Edmund Burke sense of the word. New ideas can only enter the mainstream slowly, incrementally: they begin outside the mainstream, as fringe movements, or in other countries, or as the platforms of unsuccessful third parties. If they develop a constituency, one or the other of the parties will adopt the idea and, hopefully, it's constituency as well.

In other words, since politicians can only adopt ideas that are already popular, they can never have original ideas.

As I said, it's been that way since 1791, or 1798, depending on your point of view. The Founders were original thinkers. They took the work of others, reasoned it out, built on it, and constructed a new system of governance: representative democracy. And they did a good job, too. Since then, our law has been derivative of their thinking; the optimists view things as mostly derivative of the Bill of Rights (1791) and the pessimists as mostly derivative of the Alien & Sedition Acts (1798). Either way, the only real change in the American system of government was when Lincoln replaced a federation of states with a unified nation. (And, debatably, when Truman signed the National Security Act of 1947 and ended the idea of a “peacetime nation.”)

In any case, it's not just our system that is unkind to original thinkers. People, in general, find original thought bothersome. It is, by definition, something they have not heard before, and something they have to think about. Far easier to select from the menu of talking heads and put your brain on autopilot. You can go with Falwell and maybe go to heaven; or go with Cheney and maybe get rich; or go with Nader and maybe get high; or go with Gavin Newsom and maybe get laid; or go with Arnold and maybe get laid—with a woman. Whatever your particular brand of political chloroform, original thinkers will be few and far between.

So all that being said, I resent the implication that the left is any more intellectually bankrupt than the right. This is categorically untrue.

First of all, the greatest original thinkers simply defy categorization and cannot really be placed on the left-right spectrum. Witness that both sides claim Jefferson as their own. Witness that both sides claim the ideas of Martin Luther King, Jr. as their own, if not the man himself.

Second of all, of the thinkers who can be placed—tenously—on the left-right spectrum, there are quite a few liberals. While not great thinkers on the order of Jefferson or King, Noam Chomsky and Susan Sontag* are—or were—highly intelligent people. John Maynard Keynes was not a dumb person.

Yes, disagree with these people. I do it all the time. But do not accuse a movement with the historical strength of Thomas Hobbes, Benjamin Franklin and Voltaire as having no original ideas. Do not accuse a movement with thinkers like Oliver Wendell Holmes, Hernando de Soto and John Kenneth Galbraith of being parrots.

I do not disparage the great conservatives. You have Winston Churchill on your side, and Nathaniel Hawthorne, and John Jay and Benjamin Disraeli. Your pundits and politicians may be shallow, and I will not pretend to respect Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter or the aptly-named Michael Savage. I don't ask you to respect Paul Begala or Bob Shrum or even Nancy Peolosi.

In fact, I agree with you that so many liberals “merely parrot the soundbites of their gurus.” But so do most conservatives. That is the order of things. And—more importantly—both sides have some damn good gurus out there.


*A note on Susan Sontag: She is, lamentably, remembered for saying that the 9-11 hijackers were not cowards. The text of her remarks is available on her wikipedia entry and, in context, is entirely correct. People who are not nearly as smart as Susan Sontag (i.e., Andrew Sullivan, Ed Koch) are going to make sure that her forty years of writing and thinking are less remembered than a single out-of-context sound-bite. That is a terrible thing.

Tuesday, January 04, 2005
Spectrum©
In case some of you haven't checked it out yet, I'm involved with a thoroughly engrossing new expariment in Blogging, BlogSpectrum. This week's questions are—
  1. “What in school changes need to be made to our current educational system?”
  2. “What is the case for or against charter schools? Are home schools just a way for parents to rubber stamp their children’s education? Are charter schools just a way for parents to practice intolerance in whom their children go to school with? Does either or both actually work?”
And only day after they were posted there is already an engrossing response, reading, in part—
So I would insist that the best education available to American kids is the one made available by teachers who know that they should control the point of production—who have enough confidence, and courage, to say that the interests of teachers and students converge more often than not, to say that tests are necessary but not sufficient to the measurement of effort or achievement, to say, finally, that I am here to show these kids how to think, not what to think.
Read it all...

Tsunamis
The death toll after the quake and tsunamis in the Indian ocean continues to grow. The bad news abounds, the good news is mixed, and I thought a wrap up of the biggest natural disaster in a century in order.

By far the most disturbing story comes from The Scotsman:
Swedish and Thai police are searching for a 12-year-old Swedish boy last seen leaving a Thai hospital with an unknown man in the aftermath of the south Asian tsunami.

A boy matching the description of 12-year-old Kristian Walker was last seen with a German man at a hospital near Khao Lak on Monday, but has since vanished, despite a desperate search by his American grandfather, Daniel Walker, family and police said.

In the wake of the devastating tsunami, there have been unconfirmed reports of dozens of orphaned children taken by unidentified people, some of them possibly child traffickers.
Normally the phrase Human Vermin in a headline would strike me as a bit Yellow Journalism-y, but in this case...
STOCKHOLM: In the latest example of the tsunamis exposing the worst as well as the best of human nature, Swedish authorities are refusing to release the names of people missing in the tsunami for fear their homes will be robbed.

Thieves, rapists, kidnappers and hoaxers are preying on tsunami survivors and victims' families in refugee camps and hospitals in the affected countries and in the home countries of European tourists hit by the giant waves.

In one of the worst incidents, a 12-year-old Swedish boy who survived the disaster is believed to have been kidnapped from a Thai hospital by suspected child-sex traffickers.
And that's just the sideshow. Reuters wraps up the main event:
The United Nations warned that the toll of about 150,000 known dead would rise as more bodies were found and survivors fell sick. In Indonesia's worst-hit Aceh province, infectious illnesses were already rife.
The bad news ranges from gigantically bad
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated there were more than half a million people injured and in need of medical care in six nations. Fears grew that diseases like cholera and malaria would break out among the 5 million displaced.

The U.N. agency said pneumonia, diarrhea, malaria and skin infections had already emerged in Aceh. There were cases of gangrene among survivors with wounds exposed to polluted water. Seawater and sewage have contaminated many wells.
to simply bizarre:
On Tuesday salvage crews dragged away a crippled cargo jet that had been blocking the runway at Banda Aceh, capital of the devastated province of Aceh on the northern tip of Indonesia's Sumatra island.

The airport was closed to fixed-wing craft overnight after the chartered Boeing 737 reportedly hit a water buffalo on landing and damaged its undercarriage.
You can tell an airport's in good shape when you “hit a water buffalo on landing.”

Good news is far between, although some of it is very good:
Global promises of aid total $2 billion. "It's been just phenomenal," U.N. emergency relief coordinator Jan Egeland told U.S. television.

"We have never, ever seen anything like this. In 10 days, we've had more relief to the tsunami victims than we had to all other emergencies in the world last year. It is the standard that we should set for relief to the world in the future."

Medical aid group Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) even urged the public to stop sending it money, saying it had enough for its projects in Sri Lanka and Indonesia.

U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, on his way to a global aid summit in Jakarta on Thursday, vowed Washington would help the millions hit by the December 26 tsunami to rebuild. But he said an effort on the scale of the post-World War Two Marshall Plan was probably not needed.
Nine times out of ten, I'm sympathetic to people talking suggesting the U.S. is not providing enough foreign aid to protect our most basic self-interest, let alone be charitable. But in this case, “not quite as massive as the Marshall Plan” is hardly what I'd call stingy.

Appearing on Good Morning America, Powell outlined some of the problems: “Everybody thinks you can just magically move aircraft, helicopters and aircraft carriers across an ocean in a day. ... It's not just money. It's getting food, water, medical supplies in place. It takes time to generate such an effort.” Former President's Clinton and Bush have been doing PSA's asking for private contributions.

And more importantly, Powell discussed the need for a tsunami alert system. Nature.com analyzes what's needed for such as system:
First, the region needs an extensive network of seismographs, which pick up the tremors from underwater earthquakes. Second, regional centers must be established to process and interpret the seismographic information in real time, and predict the likely impact and location of subsequent tsunamis. Third, communication systems must be set up that can relay swift warnings internationally, regionally and then to local communities.
But the final, disturbing note:
Most attention is focused on the Indian Ocean at the moment, but researchers warn that other regions at risk of tsunamis, including the Caribbean, the coasts of Central and South America and the Mediterranean, also lack adequate warning systems. "It would be unwise to put all the efforts into the Indian Ocean," says Vasily Titov, who studies tsunamis at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle, Washington.
Very unwise. Unfortunately, unwise things are something humanity is very good at doing.

Saturday, January 01, 2005
An Inasupicious New Year's
Welcome to 2005...

I'm sitting in my aunt and uncle's basement in D.C., watching a South Park marathon and flipping through the Nixon Transcripts, which are surprisingly inexpensive This is the second entry in a row that involves me sitting at my aunt's computer at four in the morning on a holiday: the same scene, though this time I'm 2071.58 miles to the east.

Acutal blogging will resume shortly.