<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6606315\x26blogName\x3dInappropriate+Content\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-6887164552313507372', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Offically No Longer an Interesting Blog
Unclear on the Concept
Publisher A©
Stealing Babies for Adoption
RIP Slobodan Milosovic
Publisher A
Hickville Dispatch©
Civil Service
Rising Sun©
Kakistocracy©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006



Support Structure
Get Firefox!


 
Wednesday, November 24, 2004
Turkey Day Eve

I saw this picture on the Better Homes & Gardens website, and I took one look at the girl before shouting, "oh, dear lord! It's the children of the corn!"

Like everyone else in the computer lab when I shouted that, you're probably wondering what I'm doing on the BH&G website. Well, I'm having one of those weeks where you think about politics, and you just want to scream, "what are you people? Stupid?"

You know what I'm talking about. You have those weeks yourself.

Don't try and deny it. I'm watching you right now, through the secret web-cam in that Pokemon action figure you thought no one knew you owned.

So, yeah. Screaming at people. Not constructive. Light blogging until I get over this. See you in a few days, and have a happy turkey day.

Monday, November 22, 2004
Miscellany
I don't have the discipline today to write on a single subject, like my post on Margaret Spellings. So here are some observations from today's New York Times:

♦♦♦

William Safire wants a constitutional amendment to allow naturalized immigrants to run for president. Usual Arnold-praise, followed by this interesting observation:
My guess is that most liberals will be conflicted as this issue develops; antidiscrimination is an article of faith, but they don't want a yodeling Republican cowboy in the White House.
A yodeling Republican cowboy in the White House? Wouldn't that be horrible.

♥♥♥

Dame Edna is opening a new off-Broadway show. All right! Some snapshots:


♣♣♣

And in the Salt Lake City market, which takes in the whole state of Utah and parts of Nevada, Idaho and Wyoming, "Desperate Housewives" is fourth, after two editions of "C.S.I." and NBC's "E.R."; Mr. Bush rolled up 72.6 percent of the vote there.
Attention, readers back in the beehive state: that fact from Bill Carter's article is perfect for the next time someone tells you that "moral values" decided this election.

I've talked before about how much of a fallacy it is to think that a)"values voters" decided this election, b)Democrats can appeal to said voters or, c)even if we could get them, we'd want them.

First, while 30% of voters checked off "moral values"—whatever that means—as what helped them chose a candidate, that still leaves 70% of voters who did not. Even assuming every single values voter went for Bush, that still leaves 20% of Americans who voted for Bush for other reasons. In an election that was decided by 3%, that 20% decided the election just as much as the values voters.

Second, if we did decide to try and appeal to these values voters, what are we gonna do? Put "God bless America" in our speeches more often? That just makes us look like we're pandering. It would be extremely difficult and time-consuming to change the conception that the Democrats are the party of the Godless Athiests after Pat Robertson has spent twenty years convincing people that voting for a liberal is tantamount to practicing witchcraft or teaching evolution. Am I the only one that thinks it might be easier to appeal to the people who voted for Bush because they believed the Swift Boat bullshit or couldn't sort out Kerry's domestic record or even just liked Bush's style better?

Finally, even if we did bring the anti-gay, anti-choice evangelical fundamentalist voters into a Democratic coalition, they would expect us to earn their vote by doing things to advance their agenda. Get rid of Roe v. Wade and put a marriage amendment in the constitution. Put the FCC in Tarantino's editing booth, and put James Dobson in the FCC. They would require us to abandon our, y'know, values.

♠♠♠

W&I©
"He made everyone believe in him, that he wasn't the typical politician, and he's just like everyone else."
That's David Fink, talking about—well, it really could be anybody.

Hat tip:Christiana

Sunday, November 21, 2004
W&I©

When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of comprehending any save the most elemental—men whose whole thinking is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either bark with the pack or be lost.

All the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre—the man who can most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

H.L. Mencken
The Baltimore Sun
July 26, 1920

1000 Words©

This photo from the November 4th USA Today of Christiana Dominguez, formerly one of my bosses on the campaign. Read her blog.

Thursday, November 18, 2004
A Tasteful, Elegant Cabinet

President Bush's nominee for Secretary of Education. The New York Times:
Announcing her nomination at the White House, Mr. Bush said that over the next four years, he and Ms. Spellings were "determined to extend the high standards and accountability measures of the No Child Left Behind Act to all of America's public high schools."

Ms. Spellings, 46, who had advised Mr. Bush on educational issues when he was governor of Texas, will take over from Rod Paige, the former superintendent of schools in Houston who was the first African-American secretary of education.


GOOD NEWS


The good news is that Spellings will be focusing on No Child Left Behind. She has in the past helped the administration soften up some of the more nutball patches in NCLB. Even better, by spending her time on NCLB, where there is still a lot of room to negotiate and both sides are at least a little willing to compromise, Spellings may be able to steer clear of some of the wedge issues so important to the President's base, like school vouchers.

Most importantly, Spellings does not seem to share her predecessors views on the NEA. Former Education Secretary Rod Paige called the union "a terrorist organization" and refused to take it back. This made it difficult for him to work with said union. By contrast, NEA president Reg Weaver struck an optimistic note on Spellings nomination, calling it an "opportunity for the administration to change the tone of its discourse with the education community."

BAD NEWS


The bad news is that Spelling's suitability for the job isn't what got her hired. It's her loyalty to the president. Bush is continuing to pack his cabinet with people who he trusts to be completely loyal to him. I suspect he feels like going outside his inner circle for his first cabinet was a mistake. The most notable outsiders he appointed in 2001 were Powell, Ashcroft, Tommy Thompson and Paul O'Neill. Ashcroft's occasional fits of sanctimony (covering statues and such) we're a continuing liability to the administration. Powell was worse: his loyalty to the President was never absolute, he occasionally questioned Bush's judgment. And O'Neill burned Bush so badly I wouldn't be surprised to see a dartboard with the former Treasury Secretary's photo in the president's residence.

Like Condi Rice or Alberto Gonzales, Spellings isn't going to be writing any books with Ron Suskind. The Times article continues:
In the White House, Ms. Spellings's office was down the corridor from that of Karl Rove, the president's chief political strategist, who first introduced her to Mr. Bush when he was running for governor of Texas in 1994. ... Ms. Spellings is seen as closely attuned to the administration's thinking and political sensibilities.
In the case of Spelling (and Gonzales) I worry about the kind of mistakes that are made when otherwise smart and intelligent people willing to put absolute faith in the judgment of someone else.

I worry about the same thing with Rice, although we really don't know much about her views; she's been very much out of the public eye, even by the standards of someone who works in Henry Kissinger's old office. WhiteHouse.org's transcript of Bush announcing Rice's nomination ends, "Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you: our new Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice. She will have no comments. Not now. Not ever."

But I've digressed. Moving back to the President's continuing attempt to surround himself with what one aide to a senior Senate Democrat called "the amen chorus." The LA Times delves deep:
Despite promises to reach out to adversaries in the wake of his election victory, President Bush is assembling a second-term Cabinet that so far seems to reflect the dictum: Only longtime loyalists need apply.

Republicans close to the White House say that reflects the president's determination to act aggressively on his second-term priorities and to reinforce the storied discipline of a White House where internal disputes have been kept largely from public view. His appointments also could consolidate the president's power, solidify his conservative agenda and reduce the possibility that Cabinet agencies might undercut administration policy during his second term.

Though he has nominated replacements for only three Cabinet officials, Bush already has relied more heavily on White House insiders than did the previous two presidents who had the opportunity to form second-term Cabinets, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

While Bush adversaries may bemoan the departure of mavericks like O'Neill and Powell, the choice of insiders gives Bush an advantage most presidents seek.

"The ultimate goal of any administration is to have a well-disciplined Cabinet that thinks they work for the president," said Gary Andres, who served on the White House staff of Bush's father. "This is a way of maximizing the chances of that happening. It's a matter of trust, comfort."

The tightly controlled team approach also increases the administration's ability to accomplish its objectives through unilateral administrative rule-making in addition to legislative action, analysts said.

Presidential scholar Shirley Anne Warshaw, author of "The Keys to Power: Managing the Presidency," cited as an example the creation of a program to promote abstinence by the Department of Health and Human Services. She predicted there would be more such initiatives during Bush's second term.

"He'll have a very conservative, loyal Cabinet and sub-Cabinet that can govern administratively," Warshaw said. "If you narrow the focus of the agenda and promulgate the appropriate rules and regulations, you don't need to govern legislatively."


Apparently, the GOP majority on the hill is just gravy. This is not good.

Wednesday, November 17, 2004
Cowboy Pete's Crackerjack Reporting
Peter David reports:
In a shocking historical moment, one of the two Thanksgiving turkeys pardoned by President George W. Bush has turned in his resignation, preferring to die rather than be pardoned by someone who refused to pardon human beings in Texas. The turkey, "Biscuits," was promptly drafted and is being shipped to Iraq.

The other turkey, "Gravy," pledged eternal fealty to Bush and is considered front runner to the first available seat on the Supreme Court.

We'll be stuffing more into this story as it develops.


"Gravy" and President Bush in the Rose Garden.

Kakistocracy©
The New York Times aquired a copy of a memy written by the new intelligence chief, Porter Goss:
[Goss] has told Central Intelligence Agency employees that their job is to "support the administration and its policies in our work. As agency employees we do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies."
They quote Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) as saying "It's just very hard to divine what's going on over there."

Of course it's not. Bush is purging anyone who might be disloyal to him. Molly Ivins observes:
Bad Nooz. In the first place, the concept of “purge” has not hitherto played much part in our history, and now is no time to start.

“Disloyalty to Bush,” or any president, is not the same as disloyalty to the country.

That’s what I was most afraid of in the next four years: the complete closing of the circle, the old Bush emphasis on loyalty as the first and most important asset. Bush has been making this mistake for years, and it is clear it will now get worse. The clash of ideas is not welcome in his office. He wants everything solved in a one-page memo.
Odd that the President would want so many memos. Whenever we get ahold of them, it's "bad nooz."

The Red & The Blue
Best map yet.

Hat tip: Andy.

Tuesday, November 16, 2004
Madame Secretary
Condolezza Rice is the new Secretary of State.

I am simply ignoring the political chatter on this. Bush is not nominating Rice because she's a woman, or because she's black; he's not nominating her to clear out the mess at Foggy Bottom; he's not nominating her because he's thinking of her chances in 2008.

He trusts her. She has been his one of his closest foreign policy advisers for his entire administration. He respects how smart and capable he is and he considers her part of his inner circle. The Chicago Tribune:
When the younger Bush ran for president in 2000, [Rice] schooled him on international affairs. He named a rise on his Texas ranch "Balkan Hill" because Rice once explained Balkan history in the middle of a 4-mile hike.
Think for a moment about Dick Cheney, Kathy Hughes, Andy Card, Alberto Gonzales (to a lesser extent) and Ms. Rice. They are all smart, capable people who have consistently demonstrated absolute personal loyalty to the President of the United States.

Bush is surrounding himself with this circle even more now than he did before. And to his credit he has chosen these people without much consideration of their political viability. To his dis-credit (if I may abuse the English language) Bush has not shown much interest in inviting people who disagree with him inside.

The Sec State thing illustrates this. Colin Powell has been the perfect "loyal opposition." He has been willing to lay it on the line for Bush (the UN speech) while—as far as we can tell—never hesitating to speak up in cabinet meetings and share a differing opinion.

Rice is far more like Cheney: shaping his policy when the President is still making up his mind; but never questioning a decision once it's been made. Unfortunately, the result of that sort of governance is seldom as good as the Tom Clancy books would make it seem.

So we can ignore all the political crap about appointing a black woman. President Bush certainly will. The good news is that the President will continue to appoint people he trusts to follow him without thinking too much about the political considerations.

That's the bad news, too.

Monday, November 15, 2004
Kakistocracy©
[unbelievably gross and obscene expletive deleted]! Colin Powell resigned.

Hat tip to Quilly for this. His guess for replacement is Tommy Franks. The AP story above wonders, too:
Most of the speculation on a successor has centered on U.N. Ambassador John Danforth, a Republican and former U.S. senator from Missouri, and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.
My own guess? Colin Powell will be quickly replaced by the German vampire Count Orlok, villain of the film Nosferatu.


  • The Count's habit of killing Germans and draining their blood demonstrates that he's on the same wavelength as the President when it comes to working with our allies.

  • The Count can only attend cabinet meetings at night, meaning the schedule put in place to accommodate John Ashcroft won't need to be changed.

  • Finally, someone who's heart beats less often than Dick Cheney!











  • Looks just like the president's grandfather, Prescott Bush, without his glasses.

  • Has the same business associates, too!

    In all fairness, I should mention a few of the other nominees:


  • Swan Song
    Rachel Lucas hasn't posted in a while. She may still be cackling over the dusty bones of John Kerry's political career. Or her lastest, greatest writing may be he swan song:

    Looking for a quick, inexpensive way to do something disgusting, hateful, and downright evil? Feeling sociopathic? Want to do something downright inhumane but don't want to go to jail? Looking for ways, through home decorating, to express the side of yourself that's ruled by pure, galling, blackhole-like malice?

    I have the perfect suggestion...

    Does the FCC Fine You For That?
    Heh heh...

    I just noticed the official blog of the MSNBC show "Hardball" is called "HardBlogger." Heh, heh.

    Thursday, November 11, 2004
    W&I©

    A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing things men have always done. If a war story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie.

    Tim O'Brien

    Wednesday, November 10, 2004
    A Personal Memory of John Ashcroft
    One of the barflies thinks we've been a bit unfair to John Ashcroft:

    > From: "Mike Spehar"
    >
    > People act as if they had personally seen Ashcroft
    > break into their neighbor's house.

    It was a dark and stormy night. I was sitting in the basement of my aunt and uncle's basement on Van Ness avenue, reading Kurt Vonnegut. I decided, little knowing what it would get me into, that I would get some leftover Chinese food.

    I have stayed with my aunt and uncle several times now, and every time there's been leftover Chinese food in the fridge. When I arrive, anyway; it's usually gone by the time I leave. So up the stairs I went, into the kitchen. There, in the fridge, I saw something that sent shivers down my spine.

    There was...no leftover Chinese food.

    I had forgotten that my aunt had joined that cult. Y'know, the Atkins diet. I mean, this is a diet that says you can't eat toast at breakfast, but you can have as much bacon as you want. From there, it's only a small step to compounds in Baja and arsenic smoothies.

    So, it's two in the morning on a dark and stormy night in a rather good neighborhood of Washington, D.C. and there's no Chinese food. If I were thinking rationally, I would have gone back to bed. But I need leftover Chinese food to think rationally. So I put a pair of boots on over my scrubs (which were all I had to wear as pajamas) and borrowed my cousin Michael's Nike jacket. I slipped out the back door into an alleyway, and headed toward Connecticut avenue and the blue line metro.

    I didn't get far. I had only gone a few feet down the alley when there was a breaking of glass and a dark, shadowy figure, encumbered by bulging sacks, jumped out of a house and darted for the alley. My Teriaki sauce deprived brain wasn't functioning on it's full level, and I didn't move as the figure, not looking where it was going, careened right at me.

    Bam. We both went down, and the thief's sacks scattered. The thief swore.

    "Watch your language, John Ashcroft!" I said.

    "Shut the [expletive deleted] up!" John Ashcroft said.

    "What are you doing breaking into people's houses in the middle of the night?" I asked.

    "I'm, ah, um...I'm stopping the terrorists!" John Ashcroft replied.

    "In Tenleytown?" I said.

    "[expletive deleted] right!" John Ashcroft said. "Don't you know the terrorists are everywhere? Anyway, what are you doing in middle of the night dressed in scrubs, work boots and a Nike jacket? That's a terrorism uniform!"

    "I'm a CNA," I said, "I need the scrubs for work."

    "Do you have a CNA license?" John Ashcroft demanded.

    "Right here," I showed him.

    "Oh. Damn. [expletive included]" said John Ashcroft. "Well, go away. I have to stop the terrorists in that house I was in."

    "That's my uncle's friend David's house," I said. "He's not a terrorist."

    "Yes he is," John Ashcroft said, holding a flashlight below his face and making scary noises. "Anyone could be a terrorist. Anyone! Your closest neighbors. Your sister. Your pet llama."

    "But David's a patriot!" I complained. "He threw a cream pie at Ralph Nader!"

    "[unbelievably gross and obscene expletive deleted] really?" asked John Ashcroft.

    "Yes. And you weren't breaking into his house to stop terrorism." I pointed to the sacks on the ground. "You were stealing his leftover Chinese food!"

    "Well," admitted John Ashcroft, "My wife has me on that damn Atkins diet."

    And John Ashcroft and me, we stayed up late into the night, sharing egg rolls and other high-carb foods.

    An I Told Ya So Post
    Read this right now.
    John Kerry was not defeated by the religious right. He was beaten by moderates who went -- reluctantly in many cases -- for President Bush. This will be hard for many Democrats to take. It's easier to salve those wounds by demonizing religious conservatives. But in the 2004 election, Democrats left votes on the table that could have created a Kerry majority.
    At the risk of arrogance, wasn't I making some of these points right here in this forum several days ago? Yes, indeed I was.

    On a serious note, this is the first really good analysis of why Bush won to come from any other self-avowed liberal. Thank you, Lawrence, for the link.

    Here's hoping the Democratic establishment can come to grips with what's in this article in the next two years. It would mean a more responsible, intelligent Democratic party. And also a victorious one.


    Snoopy Dance©


    Why am I doing the Snoopy Dance? Because Attorney General John Ashcroft has resigned. That is most certainly worthy of the Snoopy Dance, don't you think?

    In his handwritten resignation letter, Ashcroft claims:
    I take great personal satisfaction in the record which has been developed. The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved. The rule of law has been strengthened and upheld in the courts.
    Of those three sentences, only two are either flat-out wrong or physically impossible. Not a bad average for ol' Johnny.

    Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

    Monday, November 08, 2004
    Kakistocracy©
    One of the few bright spots in the Senate next year: term limits are depriving Orrin Hatch of his chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee.

    In line to replace Hatch is Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter. He often appears liberal because he has to sit next to Rick Santorum. USA Today reports:
    Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, in comments last week, noted that Senate Democrats have staged filibusters to block confirmation votes on federal judge nominees who oppose abortion and most likely would do so again. “I would expect the president to be mindful” of that, he said. Some GOP conservatives took that as a warning that Specter would keep such nominations from a vote and said Specter should be denied the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he is in line to assume next year.

    Specter pointed out Sunday that he had supported all of Bush's nominees, regardless of their positions on abortion. “Although I am pro-choice, I have supported many pro-life nominees,” he said on the CBS program Face the Nation.

    [Bush advisor Karl] Rove said Specter has pledged to hold hearings quickly on any Bush appointments and bring them to a vote: “Sen. Specter's a man of his word. We'll take him at his word.”
    I used to watch a lovely Aussie comedy called The Games. It was a fake documentary about the bureaucrats trying to organize the 2000 Summer Olympics. They had a running gag: if the minister for the Olympics expressed his complete support for someone, that person was effectively unemployed and it was safe to lay claim on his or her parking spot.

    Robert Novak (yuck) launched the opening broadside against Specter. Remember, any hint of disloyalty to President Bush is proof of treachery to Novak, and anyone proven guilty must be shown to be entirely diabolical—or at least in league with the devil. Novak concludes that "Specter's and John Kerry's positions [on abortion] are indistinguishable."
    Assuming that Specter cannot and will not make a flat commitment of support [for Bush's judicial nominees], the prospect of his imminent chairmanship poses tests for two ambitious Republicans. Will Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, eyeing the White House, marshal his power to block Specter's ascension? Will Senate Republican Conference Chairman Santorum, after alienating his base by backing Specter against serious conservative opposition in this year's Pennsylvania primary, turn against his colleague?
    Did you catch how quick that happened? The suggestion that Specter might not give unqualified support to Bush's nominees right now—before we even know who they are—and Novak jumps right to figuring out how to get him out of there.

    Absolute personal loyalty to President Bush. Robert Novak demands it.

    A final frightening thought:
    [Majority Leader Bill Frist] is considering asking the full Republican Conference to waive term limits for Hatch.