<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6606315\x26blogName\x3dInappropriate+Content\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-6887164552313507372', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Offically No Longer an Interesting Blog
Unclear on the Concept
Publisher A©
Stealing Babies for Adoption
RIP Slobodan Milosovic
Publisher A
Hickville Dispatch©
Civil Service
Rising Sun©
Kakistocracy©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006



Support Structure
Get Firefox!


 
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Deep Throat

As of this writing, there isn't that much being said on my favorite blogs about former FBI #2 Mark Felt's revelation that he not only had the perfect name for an FBI man, but was also Deep Throat.

Over the next few days, there will be some nostalgic rehashings of the Deep Throat legend. A few of our nation's professional buzz-kills will dig up whatever Mr. Felt has done wrong as a fed. But mostly, there will be this strange sense of feeling let-down.

After all, the Deep Throat we all loved, Hal Holbroke's Deep Throat, is a mythic figure, a shadow in the back of a parking garage, the modern-day Delphi for the journalism major.

Mark Felt, on the other hand, is an old man living in Santa Barbara. Nice enough, sure, but not someone who tickles resceptors in Jung's collective unconcious. Mark Felt is not the omniscient voice in the darkness we all know as Deep Throat, and in defiance of reality, we are never going to fully accept him as Deep Throat. There will almost be a bit of anger simmering in the back, in the places we don't talk about at parties, that really almost hates this Mark Felt for daring to take away our mythic, heroic Deep Throat and put some pathetic mortal in his place.

His family hints that he wants to make some money and pay off his granddaughter's college loans. I hope he does.

Friday, May 27, 2005
Holiday Wishes
Happy Memorial Day. I'll be catching up on some of the musuems I still haven't seen, getting my new memory card for my phone, and going out on an actual, grown-up-style date. Whoot.

Back on Tuesday.

1000 Words©

President Bush gave the commencement speech at the Naval Academy today. He took the opportunity to defend Secretary Rumsfeld's plan to close dozens of military bases across the country—a plan that I happen to believe is a good idea:
"In this time of unprecedented dangers, we need you to take on two difficult missions at once," [Bush] told the officers. "We need you to defeat the terrorists who want to destroy what we stand for and how we live. And at the same time, we need you to transform our military for the 21st century, so we can deter and defeat the new adversaries who may threaten our people in the decades ahead."
I'm concerned at how familiar that rhetoric sounds. "In a time of unprecedented dangers, brave men will take on two difficult missions at once." It's not like I'm surprised the President is giving a speech that makes him sound like Don LaFontaine. It's just that this was the same speech the President gave throughout the run-up to the invasion of Iraq and throughout his campaign. I'm wondering if it's not getting a little old.

Could the fact that Bush is so on message be part of the reason his approval ratings have been sliding? Take the picture above. He looks out of place. The President (on the left) is very somber, giving his "in a world of unprecedented dangers" speech. But that wasn't the mood of the event: the new officer (center) is clearly celebrating his graduation from the Naval Academy and the distinguished admiral (right) is clearly celebrating his unobstructed view of the new officer's shapely ass. Maybe Bush could have loosened up a little. I'm not saying the President should have tapped a keg with the new graduates or anything. Okay, I am. That would be cool.

Just some food for thought as we head into the holiday weekend.

Kakistocracy©
An Indianapolis father is appealing a Marion County judge's unusual order that prohibits him and his ex-wife from exposing their child to "non-mainstream religious beliefs and rituals."
Putting this Indianapolis Star up might seem like liberal masturbatory finger-pointing—"See! The Fundies really are freakshows!"—but think of it as a good example of what happens when people don't get filibustered.
The parents' Wiccan beliefs came to Bradford's attention in a confidential report prepared by the Domestic Relations Counseling Bureau, which provides recommendations to the court on child custody and visitation rights. Jones' son attends a local Catholic school.

"There is a discrepancy between Ms. Jones and Mr. Jones' lifestyle and the belief system adhered to by the parochial school. . . . Ms. Jones and Mr. Jones display little insight into the confusion these divergent belief systems will have upon (the boy) as he ages," the bureau said in its report.

But Jones, 37, Indianapolis, disputes the bureau's findings, saying he attended Bishop Chatard High School in Indianapolis as a non-Christian.

Jones has brought the case before the Indiana Court of Appeals, with help from the Indiana Civil Liberties Union. They filed their request for the appeals court to strike the one-paragraph clause in January.

"This was done without either of us requesting it and at the judge's whim," said Jones.

Thursday, May 26, 2005
1000 Words©

"Young Aymara Indians are expressing their anger in hard-driving rap, complete with rapid-fire lyrics excoriating Bolivia's leaders," or so caption on this NYTimes photo reads. What rhymes with Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada?

SALT-III
As we continue to feel out the long term effects of what I'm calling the Senate Arms Limitation Treaty, and what most of the chattering class is calling simply "the Deal," Republicans close to the GOP leadership continue to talk about breaking out the nuclear option regardless.
Republicans threatened to immediately invoke what some have called the nuclear option - doing away with the filibuster against judicial candidates - if Democrats tried to block any nominee except in the most extreme cases.

"This is merely a truce; it's not a treaty yet," said Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah and a senior member of the Judiciary Committee.
That's The New York Times. Well, a shout out to Stormin' Orrin for bravely opposing statesmanship at every turn.

That said, I think it's a mistake to frame this as a capitulation by Democrats. Certainly there's some merit to that analysis; the Democratic parties to the Deal are allowing some people to become federal judges who should not be allowed to become federal judges. But politics is a dirty business, and they're are gains to be made—very serious gains.

Look: Let's say that Bush nominates, say, Roy Cohn to become the next Supreme Court Justice. Democrats then attempt to filibuster the nomination. Of course Frist immediately starts screaming that the Dems promised not to filibuster any nominees. The Democrats point out that Cohn (a) used to be Joe McCarthy's right hand man, (b) is a closeted homosexual, and (c) died in 1986. Frist tells the Democrats to stop being such homophobes and calls a vote on the nuclear option. One of two things happens:
  • John McCain and his band of merry men deny Frist the votes he needs. Frist is humiliated and probably loses his job. Tom Minnery, Focus on Family's VP of public policy, who recently accused McCain of being "squirrelly," accuses him of being something worse.
  • Frist gets the votes he needs, and Roy Cohn becomes Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Frist gets the GOP nomination for President in 2008—and loses. Phyllis Schlafly is stunned that so many Americans are upset that a dead McCarthyite homosexual is Chief Justice. Simply stunned.
The New York Times has a piece on the McCain/Frist race for the 2008 nomination:
In a sign of the complications Dr. Frist faces in trying to balance running the Senate as he prepares to run for president in 2008, two conservative Republican senators who are also talking about running immediately attacked the agreement. Dr. Frist, of Tennessee, had promised conservatives that he could pass the measure to prohibit Democrats from using filibusters to stop votes on judicial nominations.

At the same time, Mr. McCain's role in brokering the compromise may have severely ruptured his already strained relations with the party's conservative bloc, a group that is critical to winning the presidential nomination, conservatives and some of Mr. McCain's supporters said.
The Deal has plenty of downside for the Democrats. But it's implications for the Republicans are far more important. Stay tuned...

Wednesday, May 25, 2005
The Layout
Everyone cheer for InappropriateContent's new layout.

(Bonus: A prize to the first person who figures out what the picture to the right is.)

Light posting for the near future, because I am getting used to a new job as a low-level employee of the Federal government. In addition to filling out papers to get health benefits and money for the subway, I signed the following oath, which resembles the oath the president takes:
I, J'myle Koretz, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that--

--I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

--I am not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof, and I will not so participate while and employee of the Government of the United States or any agency thereof.

--I have not, nor has anyone acting in my behalf, given, tranferred, promised or paid any consideration for or in expectation or hope of recieveing assistance in securing this appointment.
The President doesn't say the last part of that, of course.

W&I©


I don't know why Spock would be carrying a gun. Eh.

Kakistocracy©
Well, this is a good example of how the war in Iraq and the War on Terror™ are not Christian wars against Islam. Not even a llittle.

Sigh.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Kakistocracy©
So the big news of today is the signature of SALT-III—The Senate Arms Limitation Treaty. Fourteen senators from both sides of the aisle announced that they had reached a deal to resolve the the filibuster crisis that has been plauging our august body for months now. The Washington Post has a roll call:
The negotiators largely credited Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), and said they recieved signifigant support from veteran senators John W. Warner (R-Va.) and Robert C. Byrd (D-W.Va.). ... Other signers were Democrats Joseph Lieberman (Conn.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Ken Salazar (Colo.), and Daniel Inouye (Hawaii), and Republicans Susan Collins (Maine), Olympia Snowe (Maine) and Lincoln Chaffee (R.I.).
The AP calls them an “assortment of moderates, mavericks, and senior statesmen—a description that conviently covers every single member of the U.S. Senate except for the party leaders. The Post has the best reporting on the subject; staff writer Dan Balz has an analysis piece. Charles Babington and Shailagh Murray's initial reporting mentions the impact this will have on Sen. Frist's presidential bid:
Depending on how conservative groups digest the news over the next few days, one of the biggest losers in the deal could be Frist, who is weighing a presidential run in 2008. He has always insisted on up-or-down votes on judicial nominees. Amassing the support needed to win the vote on the nuclear option was considered a major test of his leadership skills and his adeptness at promoting social conservative causes.
‘Digestion’ is a good word there—James Dobson's reaction, quoted in the AP story, suggests an ulcer: Dobson “said the agreement ‘represents a complete bailout and a betrayal by a cabal of Republicans.’” Focus on Family's website has published the phone numbers of the deal's signatories and exclaims “all attempts to broker such a deal must be stopped.”

As a rational person, I enjoy seeing anything that upset's Focus on Family. But I'm hoping this helps marginalize the "values voters" groups that, apparently hold Frist in thrall. Certainly Frist appears petulant in the New York Times article:
Dr. Frist and his allies potrayed the agreement as a positive step but noted that it still did not fully meet their requirement that all judicial nominees ultimately recieve up-or-down votes. "This agreement falls short of that principle," the majority leader said.
GOP Senators Mike DeWine and Mitch McConnell both said that the agreement didn't prevent Republicans from attempting to eliminate the filibuster. That statement carrys more weight from DeWine, of course, since he was actually a party to the agreement, whereas Mitch McConnell is merely jockeying for Dr. Frist's job.

In any case, the Republican leadership cannot be all that pleased with what the Post article called “an attempt to wrest power from the leadership.” I think, unfortunately, that will blind them to the fact that there really is a downside to kow-towing to the James Dobson's of the world.

The Democrats have their own blindess, of course. Reid is quoted in all three articles: “The nuclear option is off the table.” The Times opined that Reid is “clearly euphoric and relieved,” and the Post reports that “several Democrats quickly declared victory.” They're setting themselves up for dissapointment. With Frist, McConnell, DeWine, and others saying that the nuclear option is still on the table, than it's possible that the nuclear option is still on the table. Reed should not convince himself or others that this is anything more than a temporary victory.

Look: as much as I hate to see nut-jobs like Priscilla Owen appointed dog-catcher, let alone federal judge, this deal is as close to rational and clear-headed thinking the U.S. Senate has produced in a qhile. So props to John McCain for that. But rationality has a short half-life in politics. The center, as they say, will not hold.

Monday, May 23, 2005
The Return of the GOP

One of my Republican friends recently told me flat out that Condi Rice would never be nominated because the GOP has too many racist elements in the party. I'm not to sure, especially when you consider just how much Condi would do to neautralize Hillary and bring moderates into the party. I don't believe there are enough racists left in the GOP, even among local primary voters, to sink their most electable candidate.

Some Republicans don't want to risk it. USNews reports that Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell is being floated as a candidate for the office of His Royal Superflousness.

The hot 2008 GOP presidential ticket links either Virginia Sen. George Allen or Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour with ... Blackwell.

USNews quotes a Republican strategist as saying running a Black conservative man for vice president is a "dream ticket." Especially since both the presidential hopefuls he's linked to are southerners--they may want a Southern Gentleman to reassure their party's more reactionary elements.

Just as long as Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee doesn't run. So far, Huckabee has done two things that have been noticed outside Little Rock. First, he promised to stay married to his wife. Second, he wrote a diet book. It's called Quit Digging Your Grave With a Knife and Fork (When There's a Perfectly Good Shovel in the Shed) and I would hate to see a diet book become my generation's Profiles in Courage.

Kakistocracy©
The New York Times covers Dr. Frist's latest sillyness:
“The moment draws closer when all 100 United States senators must decide a basic question of principle, whether to restore the precedent of an up or down vote...or to enshrine a new tyranny of the minority into the Senate rules,” said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Ah, yes, the tyranny of the minority. That's what John Stuart Mill was scared of when he said we need “protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling.”

1000 Words©

Sunday, May 22, 2005
Get Well
Everyone leave a get-well note for Quilly:
Nothing makes a hospital stay more interesting that passing a kidney stone when you are in for something else.

Saturday, May 21, 2005
Free Association
Speaking of my neighborhood of D.C., Chris Rock said, “It's not the neighborhood with the musuems—it's the neighborhood that elected Marion Berry four times.” That was a while ago. It's like six times now. In this neighborhood, six-year-old girls on the bus dress like Antastica.

Not that I'm about to go off on some moralistic rant. Like I'm going to tell other people how to raise their children. My complaint is that the only people who don't dress in tight pants are the 17-year-old boys.

It's not fair.

I think the heat is affecting my brain. Last year, I went to Durham, North Carolina, for a day in the height of summer. I spent most of that day feverish and semi-lucid on a ratty couch in a coffee shop with broken air conditioning. By the time the temperature was tolerable again, everything had closed down for the night, and there was nothing to do but watch an underage male prostitute wander up and down the street, waiting to be picked up.

Aside from that, Durham was fine.

I say that the heat is getting to me because yesterday, when my bus pulled up to a stop, and the ‘Bus Stop’ sign was just outside the window, I felt some separation anxiety. The sign and I were so close we'd be less than a step away in normal life, a tem which here means “when I'm not riding the bus.” But because of the god-forsaken window, I could never lean against the bus stop sign; I couldn't even lean in close and read when the next bus was due to arrive. I hated the window.

Later I remembered that windows open.

It's not just the heat. I've been stuck on center for the better part of a week. Which is worse on this center than it was in Charleston, because here when you get off-center, you're in Washington, D.C., our age's Imperial City, where the hedonism of Imperial Rome meets the indoor plumbing of Imperial London.

At the other center, when you went off hill, you were in Charleston, West Virginia, which is the other place they manufactured that stuff that spilled in Bophal.

Watching an episode of Law & Order so old, Jerry Orbach is not yet a detective, and Paul McCrane is still playing a one-scene street tough, not dreaming of the E.R. in his future.

Man, I wish the D.A. would warn him to stay away from helicopters right about now.

Heh. That was a meta-joke.

Well, I thought it was funny.

It's too damn hot out.

Friday, May 20, 2005
Dance
The unfortunately rare writing of my heterosexual life-mate Sam Hanson has become that wonderful mixture of witty and bitchy mastered in our time by Gore Vidal and William F. Buckley.
Carons mediocre band, Letters on Mountains, opened the evening with Im Not Down, a rambling pseudo-ballad that was reminiscent of the worst of Ani DiFranco.
And phrases like “infuriatingly trendy,” too. There is a cold, dark place in my heart that enjoys watching others fail—and Sam makes that part of my heart dance a cruel little jig.

Kakistocracy©
The AP has a list of the President's close, personal friends. You know the type of friend I mean. The type that is so close you insist they stay in the Lincoln Bedroom. The kind that just so happened to give your re-election campaign a dollar or two million.

Thursday, May 19, 2005
My PADD
I just figured out how to listen to radio on my new phone. First up: WNYC, New York's public radio station. They happen to be playing a special on the underground lesbian scene in China. Go WNYC.

I don't believe I've mentioned my new phone yet. It's called a Treo650. It is not so much a phone as it is a PADD—one of those Personal Access Display Device props from “Star Trek.” It's a box not much larger than a deck of cards that acts as a phone, a web browser, an e-mail device, MP3 player, Microsoft Word editor, low-res video camera, and now a radio player.

BBC radio reports that a player who recently moved from Oslo to Manchester United is alleging that he was forced into signing and that there were death threats involved. That's what happens when you sell out to an American.

Click Here©
Joe Barude's latest has a title only a policy wonk could love:
Compare and Contrast: Why Farid Ghadry Is Not the Ahmad Chalabi of Syria
Heh. Even yours truly did not know who Farid Ghadri was until I read the article. In a bit of irony, Barude spends part of the article trying to reassure us that there isn't as much anti-American sentiment in Syria as you'd think, then the first comment on his blog is an anti-American diatribe by a Syrian.

1000 Words©


Betty Bowers has taken a moment to pause her vicious Catholic-bashing to take a stab at the Mormons. Click here to get it as a T-shirt or poster!

Click Here©
Reihan Salam's recent stint at The New Republic's blog, &c., is some of the best stuff I've in quite a while. A sample:
Though not reflexively opposed to minimum wage laws, I tend to think that raising the minimum wage too sharply is likely to result in the exclusion of large numbers of people from formal labor markets. And in the shadow economy, poor people become more vulnerable to the depredations of employers far more unscrupulous than Wal-Mart...

Because some employees are too expensive to employ at higher wages--language barriers, a lack of schooling, disciplinary problems, and absenteeism are among the many factors that separate recent immigrants, those who grew up in severe poverty, and those who've been institutionalized from everyone else--they are more likely to be completely excluded, i.e., to join the ranks of the non-employed or under-employed, than they are to benefit from a steep statutory increase in the minimum wage. When you consider the very rigid labor markets found in Western Europe, where vast numbers of increasingly disaffected young people find themselves left behind without the social protections that come with holding a legal job, you can see the downside risks.
Now, I hate Wal-Mart as much as the next elite North-East liberal. But I recognize that the law should be based on more than my personal predjudices. So does Reihan Salam.

Wednesday, May 18, 2005
W&I©
“If I were to walk down the street and say ‘Barry Goldwater,’ at least three fourths of the people I stop would say, ‘Who's he?’”

—Sen. John McCain

Monday, May 16, 2005
Lawyers

When I worked for the Kerry campaign in West Virginia, people would express their disagreement with my political views by shouting “babykiller” out their car window and speeding off. In D.C., people politely inform me that they're “on the other side of the aisle,” then engage me in a stimulating discussion of the political strengths and weaknesses of Hillary Clinton, recall with remorse the unfortunate history of Jews in Spain, recommend obscure Ukranian authors, and tell stories of a sibling's rise in the ranks of the RNC—in order to inspire me to do the same in my own party.

People from West Virginia, for the most part, think people from Washington, D.C. are rude and intolerant.

Click Here©
Russ Vaughn, contributing to Walt's blog, has an idea
While driving through El Paso recently, I heard a caller to a talk-radio program laughingly suggest that we should embed Army recruiters within the frontline ranks of the Border Patrol so that they could sign up illegal immigrants and thus eliminate the Army's current recruiting deficits. I laughed, as did the host of the show, and said to my wife, “Hey, thats not a bad idea.”
Russ tackles the obvious liberal objections of exploitation by countering that it gives illegal immigrants a chance to not just earn American citizenship, but assimilate into American culture as well. He points out that the military is very good at helping service members continue their education.

And he's right: serving in the armed forces is a very good option for most of our illegal immigrants. It's still not a good option. It's still asking the desperately poor to fight and possibly die for the benefit of the rich. The larger problem of how badly our military is being mis-used in this misunderstood war would not be solved.

But we should do it anyway. Because bad as it might be, it would still be better. Better for the immigrants, better for America, better all around. There's good, and then there's good enough. And sometimes, good enough is—well, enough.

Sunday, May 15, 2005
Utah Flashbacks
Walking down the street not a moment ago, I saw a young man with a “Matheson: Making Utah Stonger” tee shirt. His name is Quentin, and he's a student at the University of Utah who's got a summer internship at a consulting firm.

We only had time to say hello, but it was surprisingly pleasant to hear some on call the University of Utah simply “the U.”

1000 Words©


Hillary, apparently, will do what it takes to get elected.

And I have to tell you, I have never seen so many headline writers at so many ;respectable news sources make so many “The End Is Neigh” jokes as I did looking for a good picture of Hillary and Newt at their joint press conference. To be fair, it is a little unnerving. But guess what? She is running for president.

Saturday, May 14, 2005
Sister You-Know-Who
Dug up from the archives: A post I wrote way back on, ah, March 3rd. Ah, the good old days. I remember them well.
Quilly writes:
Why did the Republicans start winning? Because the leadership of the party finally started reigning in the wingnuts that had a disproportionate amount of influence. Essentially the Christian Coalition was told that while their views would be respected as much as possible they were not going to set the agenda. Partial birth abortion, an issue which resonates with the electorate would be pushedbut youll never see Bush, or any other senior Republican, publicly speak about overturning Roe v. Wade.

The religious right was basically told that truth of the situation was that they had no viable option but to play along. Any other action would see what they were fighting for further eroded.
Which is true enough, and thank you very much, Mr. Buchanan. But it takes more than one party gaining strength; the Democrats are making mistakes.
Meanwhile a small, vocal segment of the Democratic Party has begun to have a disproportionate amount of influence. One of the reason that Kerry seemed to waffle was the fear of offending the DU and dKos crowd. In the end Kerry had to say that while the reasons to go to war were bad were stuck with it. We need to defend America and this is how the Democratic Party would do it. Too little, too late. Many Americans didnt feel that Kerry was really serious about it. They may not have fully been behind Bushs vision, but they felt that he was serious. Pandering to the DUers and the dKossacks, to the Dean crowd, made Kerry look indecisive and not serious. Christmas in Cambodia, The Magic Hat and the Swifties all played a big rollbut arguments as equally damning, Bushs ill-spent youth and young adulthood, rolled off his back. Because all that happened long ago in a different world that didnt have crazed Jihadis flying planes into buildings. Bush was serious.
And before we discuss if this is true, let's admit that it is commonly taken for truth among on the right; in politics, that's just as bad, if not worse. Walt complains about it all the time, as do the Token Young Conservatives; these blogs are not, I think, atypical examples of intelligent conservative views.

But there is a mistake being made here. It's not that a vocal, radical minority is hijacking the Democratic party from some centrist leadership. It looks that way because the Democratic party no longer has any real leadership, and without an organization, the loudest voices are easiest to hear. (After all, there was no shortage of moderate conservatives in 1992, but they had no one to rally around; and so Buchanan seemed louder than he really was, and he made moderate conservatives not feel so bad about voting for Bill Clinton.) The Clintonites and the DLC, after all, provided the structure and backbone of the Democratic party for the best part of a decade, but they either slipped away after 2000 or exhausted themselves during the infighting of the '04 primary. To top it off, Kerry never really had the campaign infrastructure or plain and simple charisma required to build a strong base of moderates.

I'll repeat: radicals have not hijacked the Democratic Party. There is simply a lack of powerful leadership in the party to keep the radicals in line. In the short-term, things are improving. Hillary Clinton's recent centrist maneouvering, especially on abortion, is a good example. Even arch-conservative (an not exactly a credit to his party) David Limbaugh admits:
I have always considered Hillary Clinton a formidable politician, but I haven't really feared a Hillary presidency because I haven't thought she was electable. I'm not quite as sure anymore.

Hillary is polarizing, but that's hardly a disqualifying attribute. So are her husband and President Bush, both of whom were elected twice. Indeed, in today's partisan climate, almost any strong leader of either party will ultimately be deemed polarizing.
And of course Joe Biden is optimistic about her chances. The Times of India covers Hillary beefing up her forign policy bona fides: during a recent visit, Indian Members of Parliment “completely bowled over by the former US first lady. [They] did not conceal their excitement about the meeting.” And of course all us left-wing bloggers are raving about her.

But talk of a unifying figure running in 2008 (can you belive I just called Hillary Clinton a unifying figure?) is talk of what is, at best, a short-term solution. Martin Peretz has a long look at the dearth of ideas in the Democratic party in last weeks The New Republic.

Friday, May 13, 2005
Kakistocracy©
USNews's gossip column sums up the chattering classes conventional wisdom on Dem '08:
An escalating battle between front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Cinton and 2004 nominee Sen. John Kerry. [US News] learns that Kerry is not just testing the waters: He's running. “His family wants him to run again,” says one pal.

Friends of Hillary, meanwhile, are touting her front-runner status and joining in the chorus of Democrats who think Kerry should crawl under a rock and go away.
It's like that storyline from The West Wing where the Democrats have to choose a nominee, only tedious and badly written. And, y'kno, real.

My personal preference is for Hillary, because John Kerry, my former boss, is as stiff as a very life-like cardboard cut-out of someone with a whole lot of charisma. If that picture of my cousin making out with a cardboard cutout of Frank Sinatra hadn't turned out blurry, I could show you exactly what I mean, but it did, so I can't. Also, if the GOP nominates a man, I can't wait for the “Hillary, rod him!” signs. But that's just me.

That said, absolutely the last thing the Democrats should be doing right now is have two of our three most electable candidates to shreds a year and a half before the election even begins. I mean, really—am I the only Democrat who wants to win the elections? Is that it?

Kakistocracy©
Those lefty nut-balls who accuse President Bush of only caring about opressed people who have oil are, well, nuts—right?

TNR:
During a visit to the Sudanese capital last month, Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick stunned the world by refusing to repeat Colin Powell's forthright declaration that the killing in Darfur amounted to genocide. And, last week, as first reported by The American Prospect, the White House sent a letter to Congress instructing appropriators to strike the bipartisan Darfur Accountability Act from the $82 billion supplemental bill for Iraq and Afghanistan. The Act, which easily passed the Senate, tightens sanctions on Bashir, authorizes $90 million to aid African Union peacekeepers and humanitarian assistance efforts, imposes a no-fly zone over the ravaged region, and seeks to make the genocide priority number-one in U.S.-Sudanese relations. It's unconscionable that President Bush can entertain the overtures of the Sudanese genocidaires. Yet he shows every sign of buying the argument made by Bashir adviser Gutbi Al Mahdi, who told the Times, "There can be a strong [intelligence] partnership, but there is some hesitation because the diplomatic relationship remains poor." Well, yes—and it ought to stay that way so long as the dying continues in Darfur.
And the really scary part? Sudan does have oil—just not much.

Thursday, May 12, 2005
The Benjamins
The New York Times:
An unexpected retreat in the United States' demand for imports trimmed the trade deficit in March to a six-month low, the government reported today, creating a far brighter picture of the economy than previous data suggested.
Which is good, except that the drop in imports is fueled entirely by smaller consumer goods, like textiles and toasters. Petrolium imports are up, of course. So basically, people are doing less day-to-day spending. And as much as I have a general philisophical objection to how much useless crap we buy, I doubt there's suddenly been some moral revolution in America, and we've suddenly decided to start saving money and giving more to the Salvation Army or PBS. Nor does it seem likely that Americans have suddenly decided to save more for retirement, though you never know what Bush's 60-city tour might have done to our sense of social security and Social Security.

So that really leaves two possible reasons we could be spending less. First, we're making less, and second, we're spending a larger percentage of our income on things like rent or Visa payments. Neither is the end of the world, of course, but hardly the unqualified good news the Times story would make it seem.

Of course, I'm not an economist. Neither Brad DeLong nor Max Sawicky have discussed this. When I find more on this, I'll link.

Kakistocracy©
Having grown up under the watchful parental eyes of the Utah legislature—“We know what's good for you.™”—I sympathize with those poor souls who are legislated upon by the Texas Lege, as Molly Ivins calls 'em, a group who have banned cheerleading of a “suggestive nature,” a term which here means “whatever your local wing-nut superintendant damn well wants it to mean.”

The unkind things that can be said about the Ledge are legion and wrranted. But The Onion puts it best: “If we outlawed everything some people find offensive, there wouldn't even be a Texas in the first place.”

Wednesday, May 11, 2005
1000 Words©


Because it's been too long since I posted promotional artwork for late 1950's Japanese Sci-Fi B-movies up here. Yeah.

Happiness
Congratulations are in order for Quilly Mammoth and the newly Mrs. Mammoth. Best wishes!

If you don't regularly read Quilly's blog, now's the time to start.

Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Then Again
I just posted the claim that “tensions between the military and the universities are mild.” Eh, not so much:
Protesters have occupied the office of the University [of Hawaii]'s interim President David McClain and delivered new demands on Monday, asking him to take immediate action that would stall or stop...plans for a proposed Navy research center on campus.

Citing Native Hawaiian concerns, protesters say the proposed University Affiliated Research Center, which would be the Navy's fifth on a U.S. college campus and the first in 58 years, would further militarize a state that is home to several military bases, including the Navy's Pearl Harbor and headquarters for the U.S. military's Pacific Command.
I guess that protest could be described as tense. I accept full responsibility for my error; though I should point out that this story has been so poorly covered by the mainstream media that a profile of Hawaiian wineries rates higher on Yahoo!News. I mean, hello?

[Customary rant on the incompetence of the media omitted.]

Kakistocracy©
Here's something from the things to lookforward to this October:
WASHINGTON, May 2 - The Supreme Court agreed today to consider a case involving national defense, concepts of patriotism and free speech and, not incidentally, billions of dollars in federal money.

The justices announced that they would review a lower-court ruling, in favor of 25 law schools, that universities may bar military recruiters from their campuses without risking the loss of federal aid. Arguments will be heard in the justices' next term, which begins in October.
This demonstrates, in it's own odd little way, how mild the tensions are between the services and the Ivory Tower set. What can I say? It's difficult to picture some Air National Guard recruiter making the rounds of Kent State.

Of course, I don't want to be seen as drawing a comparison between the Iraq War and Vietnam. Especially since the law schools in the case are, in the court documents at least, opposed to “Don't Ask, Don't Tell,” and not the war. I merely wanted to suggest that the animosity between the college world and the military world is not what it once was, and this court case will reflect that.

This particular clash in the “culture war” is likely to go relatively unnoticed, especially if the Jackson verdict comes in during October, or if the war takes a turn for the worse. Of course it'll get a few days in the limelight and go into everyone's lists of greivances, but it won't seem earth-shaking.

Not at first, anyway. But there is an important decision being made here: just how many rights do we now invest in our Armed Forces? Universities are things, not people, and have no right to free speech; that's why those attempts to ban those “affirmative action bakesales#&148; are so much more egregious and serious than the sales themselves, which are really rather half-baked.

But remember: the government has even less right to free speech than the universities. These are not people going to universities praising the military. These are government employees doing a job for which they are paid good money by the federal government. So while the rights of the individully nearly always trumps the “rights” of a university, the “rights” of the government do not.

The government should argue that military recruiters perform a vital service to the public and therefore the universities right to bar them should be overridden. If they argue that the universities have no right to bar the recruiters, then they're admitting that the recruiters do not, in fact, perform a vital public service. Or, worse, if they merely claim that the military recruiters perform a vital service, but don't explain what that service is—“because it's obious, and if you don't get it, you're one of them,” Ann Coulter will say—then you'll know you're really being fed a line of bullshit.

Sunday, May 01, 2005
Kakistocracy©
The New York Times today carries a story that condenses a huge amount of incredibly bad news into just a few short paragraphs.

Some of the insurgents, in an attempt to prove that they're irredeemable assholes, attacked a group of children playing near an American checkpoint. Earlier versins of the Times story carried multiple first-hand accounts of parents whose kids had been maimed or murdered. Those have been substantially trimmed and moved to the last paragraph of the story at this point, because that sort of thing is a total downer.

Other insurgents, in an attempt to prove that they're irredeemable assholes with a good sense of irony, set off a bomb that killed twenty-five people who were part of the funeral procession for a man who had been killed in an insurgent bomb attack.

The Iraqi government, in an attemt to prove that it can outdo the insurgents in the irony department, announced that the temporary head of the ministry of oil will be Ahmed Chalabi, or as I think we should be calling him, Mr. Graft.

1000 Words©
What if Canda lost it's government and nobody cared?



Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin adresses the nation, aparently to tell them that his favorite puppy is dead.

W&I©
This one is for Laura and Tammy in Knoxville:
God also gave us a spirit not of weakness, but of power, love and self control. Timidity is a tool of Satan, which he uses well. Timidity coupled with indifference or tolerance by Christians has caused our nation to slide further and further away from God and all the biblical principles our forefathers founded this nation upon.

—Lebanon, Tenn. Mayor Don Fox