<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d6606315\x26blogName\x3dInappropriate+Content\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://inappropriatecontent2.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-6887164552313507372', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Offically No Longer an Interesting Blog
Unclear on the Concept
Publisher A©
Stealing Babies for Adoption
RIP Slobodan Milosovic
Publisher A
Hickville Dispatch©
Civil Service
Rising Sun©
Kakistocracy©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006



Support Structure
Get Firefox!


 
Monday, October 31, 2005
W&I©
If we were permitted to hang two or three persons, the problems with the stock exchange would be solved for ever.

SCOTUS, POTUS, and Fetus—Oh, My!
WASHINGTON, Oct 31 (Reuters) - Samuel Alito, a federal appeals court judge chosen by President George W. Bush for the U.S. Supreme Court, has a staunchly conservative judicial philosophy that has earned him the nickname of "Scalito."
Scalito? Wow, that's like a joke, only without the funny. Those crazy lawyers.

I haven't seen anything really illuminating about Alito, possibly because I haven't been looking, although his Wikipedia entry includes a brief rundown of a few of the cases he's tried.

In 1991 he wrote a dissenting opinion in Panned Parenthood v. Casey. There's going to be a lot of hemming and hawing about that case. (Of course, there will be hemming and hawing about every little aspect of this case, as November is sweeps month, and every little thing the cable networks can blow out of proportion is one more hour that goes by without Wolf Blitzer having to rob a bank himself. For example, AP thought it would be newsworthy to get a photo-op with the nominees' wife and kids (left). "Senator, how will the fact that Judge Alito's children are attractive and his wife is, it appears, constipated, affect the confirmation hearings?" At least the photographer was in touch with the whole Dali-does-politics vibe and made sure to put them under a nice big portrait of Clinton. American politics hurts my brain.) I myself wrote a whole thing of hemming and hawing about the Casey case and then decided it was mildly shallow liberal boilerplate rhetoric. I happen to agree with a great deal of the mildly shallow liberal boilerplate rhetoric you'll find out there and am not opposed to writing it myself; I just figure why not put a link to The Huffington Post up instead? Then you can read mildly shallow liberal boilerplate rhetoric written by Alec Baldwin. You want to know what Alec Baldwin thinks about the 2006 senate races. You can tell your friends you don't care what some silly movie star thinks about politics. You can tell your parents you don't care. You can even tell yourself you don't care. But I know you're gonna go read what Alec Baldwin writes, and maybe even Larry David and Ellen, too. You can't fool the blogosphere!

But I digress, because it's fun. At right, Alito gears up for the fight by standing in a perspective distorting "z-machine" with Judiciary Committee Chair Arlen Specter. The Alito fight will be loud, long, and much of it even less witty than the Judge's nickname. (No, really, "Scalito" — even that crazy mofo Antonin Scalia has more dignity than that.) Kathleen Reardon thinks Dems should "take the high road" and try to avoid a nasty nomination fight. (Kathleen Reardon blogs at the Huffington Post, but is not famous. Some people draw that line at Nora Ephron. I prefer to use Senator Evan Bayh or, if I'm feeling charitable inclinations toward humanity, Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy. [Along with my usual inclinations, which are less toward humanity as a whole, and more toward, say, Judge Alito's son.])

The moderates are wrong. Matthew Yglesias reminds us that, for all the sound and the fury, hot button issues signify a bit more than nothing:
Nationwide, there are 246 abortions per 1,000 live births. In some conservative states, the rate is much lower. Only 154 per 1,000 in Arkansas, for example. But even 154 per 1,000 is a lot more than zero per 1,000. Some "red" states like Georgia (226) and North Carolina (230) barely differ from the national average. Meanwhile, "91.3% of all abortions occur in the woman's home state." If Roe is overturned and many conservative states implement abortion bans, that will be a big deal for the women who live in those states.

Friday, October 28, 2005
Anger
Patrick Belton is annoyed that his blog, OxBlog, is the #1 result for an internet search for "Philadelphia is Cool." The number #2 result is a Time Magazine article on pedophilia. I dont' even know how people look these things up. I guess having Google Reader up all day, every day doesn't quite make me a tech wiz. Damn. Well, at least I'm smart enough to stumble across stuff like this:
Socrates: [Draws his gun.] Aristotle, you're Plato's student, I respect you, but I will put fucking bullets through your heart if you don't take back what you said about me being violent now!

Tim Russert in the Indictment? Tim Russert in the House!
The indictment. What's up with that?

Only a few charges, but all of them damn near bulletproof. That's how a hardworking prosecutor from Chicago does things, or so this layman assumes.

Couple neat things: the New Republic gets mentioned by name on page 5, providing more evidence that it is superior to all other magazines. Also, Tim Russert is in there more than Judy Miller and Matt Cooper combined. Apparently Scooter lied about what he said to Russert regarding Plame. Which means that Tim Russert's testimony will be key to the prosecution. Anybody see that coming?
Sure, Tim Russert looks happy to see a couple of adoring policy geeks. Inside, however, Tim Russert is a boiling cauldron of pure spite and unadulterated rage. "Arrg! Kill them all!" exclaims Tim Russert, with the consummate skill of an experienced news professional. "With lasers!"

Do the Sulu Dance
AP: Sulu Comes Out, Dons Elton John Glasses

Wow. Between Ozzie Guillen and Sulu, it's a good week. (Of course, that's just Gullien's management style. George and Barbara Bush also got cought canoodling.) Anyhoodles, we've learned two things this morning. First, Sulu and his parter have been together 18 years, which means even Bill Shatner can keep secrets better than Rove. Second, we all must listen to the Sulu Dance. If not like it.

Michael Moore is a Hypocrite
So says Peter Schweizer's new book, which is making the rounds at National Review. Kathryn Lopez has interviewed Schweizer and Jonah Goldberg has a column today decrying liberal hypocrisy. Apparently Schweizer discloses the shocking news that Michael Moore is a hypocrite—his foundation owns Halliburton stock. Nancy Pelosi and Noam Chomsky also are hypocrites.

My first instinct is to write, of course, true believers are always the worst, whatever the cause. Who knows how many of the moral crusaders smearing President Cleveland for having a baby out of wedlock were adulterers themselves?

But then I think: hey, I spend plenty of time chuckling over, say, Brio Magazine. Why complain if Jonah Goldberg blows off some steam by taking a few easy shots at some liberals who have, lets face it, made themselves easy targets?

Kathryn Lopez asked Schweizer "doesn't revealing Barbra Streisand's water bill feel a little like going through her garbage?" She immediately caught herself and changed the question to "Did you have to go through her garbage?" It's a better question: after all, she's didn't write a whole book on this stuff, she's just have a few laughs at work.

Darfur
Eric Reeves, a professor at Smith college who wrote an excellent overview of the Darfur situation in July has an update. Apparently big business triumphs over all:
The same vicious cabal in Khartoum that was explicitly declared by former Secretary of State Colin Powell to be responsible for genocide in Darfur has now been allowed to secure the services of a former State Department employee to provide it with p.r. counsel. For a fee of $530,000 per year, the firm's role will essentially be to put a happy face on a genocidal regime.
Blech. Look: Fox is reporting that Scooter Libby will the the only one indicted today. Of course I'm disappointed, but let's face it: Karl Rove is nothing compared to the Janjaweed.

The Corner
A good point from the Corner:
Pat [Fitzgerald] has never given up his day job throughout this appointment. That job is being the U.S. attorney in Chicago —– responsible for the enforcement of federal law in a 150-lawyer office in the 3d or 4th largest district in the country. Indictments in that office, since he took over in 2001, are up by something like 100 percent, and they have done impressive work in terrorism financing, organized crime, securities fraud and political corruption. Further, unlike most U.S. attorneys, who leave the work to the staff and just steer the ship, he has always handled some of the big cases himself.

He is thus actually far busier than normal prosecutors, and there is no reason to fear that — like Starr, Walsh or Barrett — his only mission in life is to be the full-time, personal prosecutor for a few beleaguered public servants. (This investigation, in fact, has cost the public a bare fraction of what those other magillas cost.)
The press conference is at 2:00 EST. K-Lo and the other Corner-ites keep saying "can we just get on with it?" Well, we Bush-haters are on the edges of our seats as well. I'm gonna go throw myself into work and I just might end up taking a long lunch at, say, around two so I can hang around at the two-story screen on the Channel 7 building across the street.

Thursday, October 27, 2005
More Brio
Matt Yglesias has posted one or two of the more interesting things he's found in Brio, a magazine published by Focus on the Family to provide an alternative to magazines like Seventeen and Teen People. Finally, a magazine that combines the tolerant example of James Dobson with the educational heft of Aaron Carter. Joy.

Hey, kids! Let's learn about Uganda!
Dear Susie:
I’m a teen girl living in Uganda. I really love listening to music! I enjoy Whitney Houston, Alicia Keys and a very long list of gospel artists. I love the talent and passion that Whitney and Alicia use in their music. Any Christian artists you recommend that provide the same sound?

Ynang Silas
Uganda, Africa

Dear Ynang:
Check out Nicole C. Mullen, Charity Von or Rachel Lampa. By the way, I’ve been to your country and loved it!
And that's the end of that article. I wish Susie would push the boundaries a little: betcha $20 she could have told her readers to check out the "Christian song stylings" of Idi Amin without the editors noticing.

A Budget for Halloween
Over at Democracy Arsenal, Lorelei Kelly channels Ike Eisenhower:
Today I walked through the Capitol South metro station on my way up to the Hill. Metro stations are full of large advertisements. This fall, the defense bills have been wending their way through committees. Hence fighter planes, guns,submarines and lots of gadet laden soldiers float along the walls of most DC metro stations like an X-box dream menu. Capitol South had a nautical theme.

I learned that the Coast Guard's Deepwater program is made in 41 states. That the shiny ship I was looking at was "the future of littoral combat" (Fire that ad agency!) and that the DDX destroyer was going to guarantee my freedom...

The final bit of unseriousness came when I picked up the Hill newspaper and read that a new Senate group the "Fiscal Watch Team" had joined House Conservatives on the Republican Study Committee in proposing offsets in the federal budget to mitigate the costs of Katrina. The Fiscal Watch Team proposes 5% across the board cuts to domestic spending. Defense and Homeland Security are off the table. Defense industry advertisers are probably very grateful for this decision as they can now spend their earnings on flu shots, which they will need, as American hospitals are in the cross hairs of conservative budgeteers just as avian flu marches closer to the Atlantic ocean. I thought the House's "operation offset would be more fair because it included a section on defense. But the only cost savings on defense ideas they have are a garage sale for old boats and some sort of privatization scheme for veterans health.

This is not a government that is serious about national security.

Robot Overlords
Over at The Corner, the subject of the morning is what role conservative elites played in the now-officially failed nomination of Harriet Miers. Has it occured to anyone else that Miers is a lot like JFK's erstwhile secretary Evelyn Lincoln? Wasn't she a hanger-on as well? Will Miers write a gushing book about how wonderful the Bushes are?

Speaking of JFK, Jonah Goldberg posted a reader e-mail this morning that included the words "party discipline matters. That's one area where Democrats have always outshone us." Um. As of this writing, no one at the corner has publicly called them on this. Can I politely remind everyone that Lyndon Johnson is dead?

Anyhoodles, who cares about SCOTUS when there are robots? Jonah welcomes our new robot overlords. If you want to signal your allegiance, there are of course tee-shirts at hand. This time, though, the liberal media have the real story about our new lords and masters.

Speaking of the robots, Harriet Miers, and end of humanity in general, the White Sox won the pennant. What the hell? Chicago next? It's discombobulating, which probably explains how this unidentified White Sox fan could so utterly abandon all standards of taste. I mean, Ozzie Guillen? Please.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005
RIP Rosa Parks
"[They say] that my feet were hurting and I didn't know why I refused to stand up when they told me. But the real reason of my not standing up was I felt that I had a right to be treated as any other passenger. We had endured that kind of treatment for too long."
Rosa Parks was not a little old lady when she refused to give up her seat in December 1955. She was a 42-year-old woman who knew what she was doing. The Civil Rights movement was not about feeling sorry for black people; it was about fighting injustice and standing up for what's right.

Let us remember a woman who stood up for what's right by sitting down right where she was.

What Would John McCain Know About Torturing Prisioners, Anyway?
The New York Times:
WASHINGTON, Oct. 24 - Stepping up a confrontation with the Senate over the handling of detainees, the White House is insisting that the Central Intelligence Agency be exempted from a proposed ban on abusive treatment of suspected Qaeda militants and other terrorists...
Vice President Dick Cheney and the C.I.A. director, Porter J. Goss, urged Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who wrote the amendment, to support an exemption for the agency, arguing that the president needed maximum flexibility in dealing with the global war on terrorism.
McCain, to his everlasting credit, rejected the White House's exemption. The administration is threatening to veto the legislation. That would make President Bush's first veto, after six years in office, a veto to allow the CIA to torture prisoners. As usual, that old Ben Franklin quote about giving up liberty for safety is apt. As usual, here's to John McCain.

Monday, October 24, 2005
Quizilla: Internet Crack


How Politically Savvy Are You?

The quizilla machine. It starts with one little quiz, and then... I can't think of a way to finish that analogy. I'm gonna go take more quizes...

Follow the Money
The Carpetbagger Report notes this mind-boggling interview in the New York Times. Connie Mack, a former GOP senator from Florida, is heading the White House commission on reforming the tax code.
DEBORAH SOLOMON, New York Times: Well, the U.S. government has to get money from somewhere. As a two-term former Republican senator from Florida, where do you suggest we get money from?

Connie Mack: What money?

NYT: The money to run this country.

Mack: We'll borrow it.

NYT: I never understand where all this money comes from.

Mack: When the president says we need another $200 billion for Katrina repairs, does he just go and borrow it from the Saudis?

In a sense, we do. Maybe the Chinese.

NYT: Is that fair to our children? If we keep borrowing at this level, won't the Arabs or the Chinese eventually own this country?

Mack: I am not worried about that. We are a huge country producing enormous assets day in and day out. We have great strength, and we have always adjusted to difficulties that faced us, and we will continue to do so.

NYT: Wasn't your grandfather, who was also named Connie Mack, one of the founders of Major League Baseball?

Mack: My grandfather was instrumental in the creation of the American League. My dad was with the baseball team as well. It was the Philadelphia Athletics.

NYT: Did you ever play professionally yourself?
We'll borrow it? By letting our children "adjust to the difficulties that face us?" The Philadelphia Athletics? We'll borrow it from the Chinese?! What is wrong with these people?

1000 Words©
I was big once, thinks the Apple III to itself. The Apple III is old and lonely. It's grandchildren never come to visit. They're young and iPods and having a good time being engraved by U2 or Madonna. Poor Apple III.

Dead Poets Society
Catilin Flanagan gets loquacious in the Atlantic on Wifely Duties:
My children are still very small, but it has been made abundantly clear to me by friends and acquaintances that I had better get in the market for an SUV or a minivan, because I am soon enough going to be shuttling the children and their friends to a bewildering series of soccer games, soccer parties, soccer tournaments... Mothering, which used to be a rather private affair (requiring, principally, a playpen, a back yard, a television set, and a coffeepot), has now adopted a very public dimension. Why, of course Sarah So-and-So is a good mother: little Andrew is at Gymboree, Music Rhapsody, Bright Child, and Fit for Kids every week! All of domestic life now turns on the entertainment and happiness not of the adults but of the children. At vacation time my husband and I don't drag our little boys through the Louvre, as I was dragged at a tender age (because my parents wanted to see it, and it would never have occurred to them to consult their children about where to go on holiday).
Matthew Yglesias agrees:
For a parent to participate in some amusement they don't really care for because the kids like it is totally normal. To demand that the kids put up with something the adults want to do is unthinkable. People inconvenience themselves by moving further and further toward the fringes of urban areas in order to be able to afford houses and yards that are, by world standards, simply enormous and huge swathes of these massive spaces are given over to the children. Sentiments like "children are to be seen and not heard" couldn't be be more dead. In essence, couples are expected to more-or-less give up on their lives for a couple of decades in order to raise their kids. To do anything less -- to inconvenience or annoy your children or deprive them of something they might want to do or to have for the sake of something you want -- would be abhorrent and neglectful.
I wonder how much the children appreciate all this quality time with their parents. Or if anyone has had the guts to ask.

Sunday, October 23, 2005
We Miss You, Sandra Day!

Friday, October 21, 2005
Water What?
"AS BAD AS WATERGATE," screamed the handmade sign outside the Rosslyn Metro station this afternoon. "SEND LIBBY ROVE AND CHENEY TO JAIL," it demanded, culminating in the command, underlined twice in red Sharpie, "SEND BUSH TO THE NUTHOUSE."

It's not the first time political lit has been handed out at the Rosslyn Metro station. There have been a couple people passing out flyers for Virginia's gubernatorial candidates, quickly engaged in a race to the bottom vis à vis negative ads, and every couple of weeks there is some otherwise reasonable person handing out the latest issue of Lyndon LaRouche's newsletter. The Bad as Watergate sign seemed closer to the LaRouche lit than the governor's race.

Except the LaRouche people don't usually have a sign. Nor do they have a card table attached to the sign. If they did have a table, it might have just as many pamphlets and newsletters piled on it, but it certainly wouldn't have had what the As Bad as Watergate booth had: a couple of people who were actually paying attention.

Blog Politics
There's been some recent blather involving a dem senatorial primary and which bloggers are getting paid by which candidates. Since following politics in Ohio is basically rubbernecking, I'll spare you the details.

I do want to share DemocracyGuy's assessment of the scandal.
Folks, it's time to wake up and smell the coffee. The flavor of the day is payola. It's a strong blend of hypocrisy, greed, and opportunism, fed by the fawning naivete of people who have no idea they're being taken to the cleaners.
Blogs? Meet the New Media, same as the old media.

Click Here©
Here's a headline from a radio station in the Seattle suburbs:
Gun-Wielding Clowns Rob Doughnut Shop
In other news, I'm working on redesigning the blog—again—to find some code that doesn't go wonky in Firefox. Which is still cool.

I've always known clowns were up to no good.

Gearhead Orgasm
The only way I'll get near a motorcycle is if I can ride sidecar with Dykes on Bikes...is what I used to say before I saw this baby.

Yamaha's concept model of a high-performance hybrid motorcycle, the 'Gen-Ryu.' (Photo: AFP/Yoshikazu Tsuno) 600cc engine and electric motor hybrid system which can achieve over 1,000cc class machine performance. I'm not really sure what those numbers mean, but I do know that I want a space-bike, and I want one now.

Thursday, October 20, 2005
DeDemocrat
This from that bastion of journalism, USAToday:
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Republican Rep. Tom DeLay's fate could hinge on a Stetson-wearing defense attorney who not only represented Waco cult leader David Koresh and helped a cross-dressing millionaire beat a murder rap, but is also a Democrat.
Because in Texas, cross-dressing millionaire murderers are more common than Democrats. Or so the editorial staff of USAToday—located just outside of DC in McLean, VA, a town as blue-state as it gets—will be happy to assure you over drinks in a swank Georgetown "authentic watering hole." By the way, DeLay's lawyer looks a bit like Gore Vidal.

Wednesday, October 19, 2005
1000 Words©
A picture of Saddam Hussein as a child. Next time you're tempted to be one of those people who thinks little kids are "just so cute," remember that they grow up to be Saddam Hussein. (AP Photo/File)

Envy
There are justsome blogs I know I can never hold a candle to:
On Yahoo! Search, OxBlog is one of the top ten websites that come up if you enter 'salma hayek sucking'. What really baffles me, though, is why anyone would actually click on the link to our website when the other nine results seem to promise so much more of what one is presumably looking for.

On a related note, OxBlog is the first (yup, first) website that comes up if you Yahoo! Search 'is harry potter circumcise'. I had hoped that our readers would have better grammar.

Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Chairman Mao Accuses Richard Nixon of Corruption
The Washington Times:
ROME -- Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe yesterday railed against President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, calling them "international terrorists" bent on world domination like Adolf Hitler.

1000 Words©
Sex worker Camille Cabral, representing French prostitutes, poses next to a European Union flag after a press conference organised by the International Committee on the Rights of Sex Workers in Europe (ICRSE), at the European Parliament in Brussels, October 17, 2005. The ICRSE wants to end the criminalization of the sex industry and give prostitutes the same social rights as other workers. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

An Iraqi-Constitution Class Starship
The Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq is very concerned of that the Constitution vote may have been rigged. Indeed, ABC News managed to get ahold of video of one man marking seven ballots "yes" one after another. Well, with the troubles Louisiana's been having, somewhere had to step up to the plate and be the world leader in election fraud.

The Bush gang isn't going to let this get them down. The BBC:
During her visit to London last week, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said initial information from the field indicated the constitution would be backed. Hussein Hindawi, an official at the [IECI], said he was "surprised" by the statement. "As far as I know, she does not work at the Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq," Mr Hindawi added.
Democracy Guy advised the Secretary to "get down wit yo incompetent bad self."

Monday, October 17, 2005
Breach of Contract With America
Rumor mill says Nanci Pelosi is working the Democrats Contract with America. More power to her: I'm all for campaigning against GOP corruption, incompetence, dim-witted-ness, and such. Today's ">must read is Suzanne Nossel, a one-woman answer to David Adesnik's question, "do the Democrats have the slightest idea what getting tough of national security would entail?"
The bulk of any [Contract With America-style] proposal will deal with domestic policy, but here are nine ideas to get the ball rolling on what the foreign policy planks of such a contract could be...

Back to the City, Quick!
Quilly has an interesting observation:
Moved 75 miles because I just can't afford the commute from the real country to work anymore. When you can buy a house for what it costs you to commute you probably ought to. So I did. Picking up 2 1/2 hours of time each day not spent driving is a bonus as well.

Maybe the rising price of gasoline will be what reverses the flight from the city. It has in my case.
DC is a good example of what the major cities on the Eastern Seaboard will look like in ten years, if Quilly's prediction is correct. DC is in the middle of a job boom, economic renaissance, inevitable gentrification. Most of the poor black residents of northeast will be forced into southeast and Prince George's County, Maryland, in the next ten years. (However, DC's housing board has developed a good process for transforming public-owned housing projects into tenant-owned co-ops in gentrifying neighborhoods. It's a perfect example of how a New Deal sort of programs are supposed to work, with few of the terrible screw-ups that usually come with them.)

DC is also in the middle of a housing boom that has left most of the long-term Districters I know in a state of what can only be described as shell-shock. One young couple I know purchased a condo shortly after they got out of law school. It's value has grown so much in just two and a half years that by selling it and moving out west, they could pay off their student loans—something that usually takes ten or fifteen years.

And while I'm on the subject of housing, I need to go look at roomate ads. See you all tomorrow.

Kakistocracy©
The New York Times had this tidbit over the weekend:
Increasingly, officials say, Syria is to the Iraq war what Cambodia was in the Vietnam War: a sanctuary for fighters, money and supplies to flow over the border and, ultimately, a place for a shadow struggle.
Anyone remember how well that worked out for us?

Friday, October 14, 2005
W&I©
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that during a Supreme Court Case that dealt with the free spech rights of federal employees
New Chief Justice John Roberts ... said a law clerk might write him a memo claiming that another justice has a "wacky" approach to the law. Roberts wondered if he could fire the clerk, without being sued on free speech grounds.

Scalia said that the example was not a good one.

"Nobody's wacko here," he said.

Birthdays
OxBlog reminds us that yesterday was the birthday of one of the researchers who invented soft frozen ice cream in the late forties. Apparently she later went on to some sort of political career.

More Miers
I started writing transcripts of a Miers confirmation hearing yesterday, like I did for John Roberts. A few lines in, I stopped: it wasn't funny. It was mean.

I could make fun of John Roberts because he was a sure thing. With Miers, it's different. (For me. Other people are hilarious.) Her confirmation is uncertain. The White House, caught between a special prosecutor and bad polling, may have fumbled the pick. So, to me, Miers is less of a target for cheap jokes.

Look: it's good Miers is in trouble. Read her bio: she's a Bush crony, underqualified, was a lottery commissioner. Since being nominated, she has said nothing, done nothing, at all encouraging. John Roberts was experienced and qualified. (Not extraordinary, but prodigious reason is not, these days, a marketable skill.) Miers is charming in person, I'm sure, but as a nominee, she is depressing.

Other places (TNR, NRO, etc) say similar things, more insightfully, persuasively. My point was that I'm having trouble being funny, which is far more ominous than three decades of ill-reasoned rulings written by clerks, a group perennially underpaid, overworked, and inebriated. (Undressed as well, if I have anything to say about it.)

I need some time for reflection, reading, other hippy nonsense. I must be less in touch with my inner child, whiny and angsty creature, and closer to my inner plagiarist. Accomplish that, and keep reading back issues of The Onion, I'll be chuckle-worthy again in no time.

Russians, Irishmen & the Dutch
What do you call Ireland with vodka instead of ale?

Wait. First, I need a minute to cackle gleefully: Karl Rove is testifying before the Plame case Grand Jury even as I type. Couldn't happen to a more deserving fella.

Right, that was fun. Now: Ireland with vodka instead of ale is: the Caucasus!

I haven't read much about Thursday's raid on Nalchik. Americans are notoriously unconcerned with anywhere in far-east fringes of Europe. Unless Dracula lived there. To be fair, even the Russians don't pay much attention to Nalchik: it's the official capital of Kabardino-Balkaria, but all the real work is done in Tyrnyauz. All Nalchik has to recommend it is a totally bitchin' coat of arms (left). Yet I wish people were paying more attention to the dozens of rebels killed in gun battles with Russian security forces over the last two days. It seems worthy of note.

The news is garbled. The Russians claim to have killed 72 rebels. A rebel web site says 11 are dead, four missing. The last rebel hold-outs were captured Friday afternoon. (Thanks to the magic of time zones, I can write that sentence on Friday morning without being insane and/or a time traveler.) Chechen separatists claim to have worked with local rebels on the assault. (Nalchik is in Russia, but less than a hundred miles from Chechnya.) Vladmir Putin claims the fighters were all outsiders, and that he is going to kick their ass, and also that he is on the verge of being able to bend space and time to his will through the dark arts.

So what was that odd joke about Ireland? Well, most commentators discuss Chechnya in the context of Islamic fundamentalism. Fair enough: Chechen rebels are Muslim, get support and training from Saudis, Al Quaeda, others. But we should remember that the rank-and-file of the Chechen fighters are fighting for the Independent Republic of Chechnya, or to topple the oppressive Russians, or because they have no jobs and live in the bloody Caucasus. Few consider themselves to be on a Jihad the way bin Laden, al-Zarqawi, and Fred Phelps do. So: while the situation is not the same as Ireland circa 1980 (the year of the Monkey, the Gipper, and doom), that analogy is much more useful than a al Qaeda comparison.

Just some food for thought.

Master of Understatement Award
This prestigious award (in politics, far less common than the Master of Hyperbole Award) goes to Christiana, aka Phoblographer*, and is richly deserved:
It does seem less necessary to export condemnation of eating dogs than, say, female genital mutilation.
As I've mentioned the Master of Hyperbole Award, I may as well award it. Quilly Mammoth recently heard that French ex-ambassador to the UN has been arrested in the oil-for-food scandal. Upon hearing the news, Quilly wonders, are "Chirac and Schroeder are simply dhimmi loving neo-commies that hate anything America does simply because it’s America?"

Thursday, October 13, 2005
Google, Devourer of Souls
Miers Forces Instapundit Interactive, Prayer Competition:
I love all these conservatives running around telling other conservatives something along the lines of, 'Trust Bush...she's just as insane as we are!' Nothing like fundamentalists arguing about who is more fundamental...Maybe you should ask them if they identify themselves as Dobson conservatives, Bush conservatives, or just insane people?
Okay, I just thought that quote was pretty funny and wanted to show off this wonderful feature in Google Reader that lets me automatically quote and post any of my favorite blogs.

What is Google Reader? It's a new service that automatically compiles all my blogs so I can read them on one snazzy, easy to use site. In short, it is awesomeness. (And also the next step in Google's master plan.) If you don't have Google Earth, Google Mail, and Google Reader, you are not with it.

Commander in Chief
This fall, you may have heard, a woman will be president. I missed the pilot of Commander in Chief, but caught up thanks to the good folks at Television Without Pity. Now that I've seen a couple episodes, I'm filled with longing for the days of yore, heady days when Aaron Sorkin was still writing The West Wing.

It's not that Mackenzie Allen, or Mac, is a notably bad president or anything. Aside from naming her son Horace (a lapse in judgment I'm inclined to blame on her somewhat boobish husband, Rod) she is in fact doing very well under difficult circumstances.

It's just...well, where Sorkin would moderate, Commander in Chief polarizes, and so demonizes. The show's GOP house majority leader is a Donald Southerland so evil he actually wears a black hat. Granted, it's a funeral, but still. He makes Tom DeLay look good, or a least less bad, a feat that requires a significant evil quotient.

Not that it's a partisan show, because the Democratic senate leadership is just as evil, if somewhat better dressed. Mac herself is an independent who a Republican president brought on his ticket as stunt casting. Now the president is dead and she's running things by putting the country first and not her party. If this sounds a little familiar, it's because it's exactly the same as the plot of Tom Clancy's novel Executive Orders, only with a woman, and also they took out the plot point where a crazed Air Japan pilot slams his 747 into the Capitol building: presumably, that would have been in bad taste.

Well, tastelessness aside, Commander in Chief and Clancy do share a common fantasy: a knight in shining armor riding in on something horse-like (Clancy's Jack Ryan likes biking and motorcycles, Mac kayaks up the Potomac, helicopter escort in hot pursuit) to run this country for the people and not the special interests.

I'm pretty sure the Constitution has a few things in it to keep anyone from taking over the country, for the people or otherwise. That sort of thing made Madison jittery, you know. But don't let that stop you from having fun. Geena Davis still rocks hard core.

Hickville Dispatch©
News from the Beehive State: Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, Jr. has teamed up with New Mexico Governor and Democrat Bill Richardson in an attempt to create a regional primary out west.

I dislike Governor Huntsman on principle: he, along with Nolan Karras, beat Governor Olene Walker at the 2004 Utah GOP convention. Not just Utah's first female governor, Walker was incredibly popular, very smart, and a good person. Naturally, the Utah Republicans torpedoed her as quickly as possible. Because they are batshit crazy. Until now, Huntsman has done nothing during his first year in office that would make me think better of him; quite possibly, he has done nothing at all. (That would hardly be unprecedented. Heath and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt was governor for ten years, and there is still only circumstantial evidence that he did things while in office.)

Above, Hunstman giving a speech at the Hansen Planetarium, one of my favorite places back in Salt Lake. A regional primary would be a very good thing. Working for Dean in Iowa last year did not endear me to the Iowa-New Hampshire primary system. Some of the reasons are shallow: Iowa is cold and flat, the southwest is neither. More substantially, the current system is not very democratic; residents of two small states play a hugely disproportionate role in choosing presidential candidates. I'd would prefer to see a revolving regional primary; this could be the first step.

So Hunstman deserves credit for this, especially since he has very little to gain. Richardson has quite a bit to gain: he's a contender for the Democratic nomination in 2008, with a regional primary, the state he's governor of is among the first to vote. You know, I suppose it's possible Huntsman sees himself as a possible Republican '08 nominee: Utah Republicans have a tendency, as I said, to be batshit crazy. But let's give him the benefit of the doubt here, because he's doing a good thing for democracy, the west, the country.

If he's not crazy, he's doing a very good thing. If he is crazy, he's still doing a good thing and we'll get to see Condi Rice make him cry like a little girl.

Good times.

So You've Started a Blog
Democracy Guy has some deep thoughts on blogging:
You know when people read blogs? They read blogs between 9 am and 5 pm, Monday through Friday. A very civilized schedule. You know why? Because people who read blogs work in offices with computers at their desks, they're bored, would rather be doing literally anything else, and that other thing is reading blogs.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005
Harriet Miers
Read yesterday on The Corner that when Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers was asked to name her favorite chief justice, she said "Warren" and no one could figure out if she meant Warren Burger or Earl Warren. Warren Burger, says WaPo. I would have liked her to say, "No, no, I meant Warren Beatty."

The New Republic put Miers on the cover last week. She's number one on their list of Top 15 Bush Administration Hacks--in their words, "hackocracy." But Bush is hardly the cause of an America that elevates the least qualified to the gravest responsibilities; he is a symptom. Scott Adams has been complaining about this in the funny pages for the better part of two decades, most effectively in 1997's The Dilbert Principle. (Regular readers of this blog may recall the old word for a society governed by it's least competent citizens is kakistocracy.)

Anyhoodles, rumor has it Capitol Hill's GOP staffers don't like Miers, by and large. If true, that makes confirmation difficult. Picture Senator John Kyl asking, "Can you tell us, Miss Miers, how exactly being commissioner of the Texas lottery prepared you to be a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States?" Well: Democracy Guy has been gleefully cackling over the Ohio GOP's implosion--will I get the chance to do the same here?

On the other hand (left or right?) another Corner piece describes conservatives bitching about Miers as disconnected, discombobulated elites, similar to liberal elites, except not enthusiasts of sodomy, publicly. James Dobson has been on the morning shows, selling Harriet. Katherine Lopez has received hate mail accusing her of not supporting the President, which, it's true, she is not.

Kakistocracy©
So, in the last days before the constitutional referendum, leaders in Iraq have struck a deal to bring the Sunnis on board. The New York Times calls it "an important last-minute change in the draft constitution." The Washington Post notes that "Iraq's top Shiite and Kurdish leaders publicly agreed Wednesday to what they said were Sunni Arab demands for the new constitution." The Associated Press sees "last-minute compromises." Iraqi President Jalal Talibani held a major press conference this morning to announce the deal, with speakers that included the leaders of Iraq's most powerful political parties and a few noteworthy Sunnis. It's true American-style democracy: lots of style and no substance.
The deal the negotiators reached yesterday night agrees on a mechanism to consider amending the constitution after it is approved in Saturday’s nationwide vote.

The next parliament, to be formed in December, will set up a commission to consider amendments, which would later have to be approved by parliament and submitted to another referendum. That would give Sunnis the ability to try later to introduce...
That's not an agreement, it's a campaign promise. Condi's or Jalal's, remains to be seen.

Instant Messaging

Headline
Lest my praise of David Brooks make anyone question my liberal bona fides, here's today's top story:
Bush To Appoint Someone To Be In Charge Of Country

October 12, 2005

WASHINGTON, DC—In response to increasing criticism of his handling of the war in Iraq and the disaster in the Gulf Coast, as well as other issues, such as Social Security reform, the national deficit, and rising gas prices, President Bush is expected to appoint someone to run the U.S. as soon as Friday.
The Cabinet-level position, to be known as Secretary of the Nation, was established by an executive order Sept. 2, but has remained unfilled in the intervening weeks.

Among the new secretary's duties are preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States, commanding the U.S. armed forces, appointing judges and ambassadors, and vetoing congressional legislation. The secretary will also be tasked with overseeing all foreign and domestic affairs, including those relating to the economy, natural disasters, national infrastructure, homeland security, poverty, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The secretary will report directly to the president.

David Brooks
Now that the New York Times is charging money for it's editorials, I rarely get to read them any more; actually paying for journalism is something I reserve for the unparalleled The New Republic and, in the spirit of keeping an eye on the other side, Bill Buckley's little newsletter.

On Sunday, Bull Moose was kind enough to post the bulk of David Brooks' editorial:
After a while, you get sick of the DeLays of the right and the Deans of the left. After a while, you tire of the current Republicans, who lack a coherent governing philosophy, and the current Democrats, who are completely bereft of ideas. After a while you begin to wonder: Did I really get engaged in politics so I could spend months arguing about the confirmation of Harriet Miers, the John Major of American jurisprudence?

And when you begin thinking this way, you find yourself emotionally disengaging from the exhausted clans that dominate the present. You find yourself going back to basics and considering the fundamental questions: What visions originally excited me about politics and government? If it were completely up to me, where would I plant my flag?

Here's where I would plant mine.

I believe in the lost tradition of American politics, the tradition of Hamilton, Lincoln and the Bull Moose. In other words, I believe that social mobility is the core of the American experience. I believe that society should be structured so that as many boys and girls as possible can work, and rise the way young Hamilton and Lincoln did...

I know, having learned it from Lincoln and Roosevelt, that individual initiative should always be tied to national union. I know we need a national service program to bind our segmented youth through citizenship. I know we need to protect the natural heritage that defines us. I know America has to persevere in its exceptional mission to promote freedom, and the effort to promote democracy in the Arab world is one of the most difficult and noble endeavors any great power has undertaken.

When I cut myself loose from the push and shove of today's weary political titans, and go back to basics, I find myself strangely invigorated.

It's time for an insurrection.
It's not every Sunday you want to shake hands with one of the neo-con standard bearers.

1000 Words©

I'm Back!
So: I was gone over a week for no particular reason. I certainly did blog-worthy things. I saw Avery Brooks in "Othello," and I saw the movies Serenity, Dear Wendy, MirrorMask, and Separate Lies. Don't Captain Sisko, Joss Whedon, Lars "What the Hell?" von Trier, Niel Gaiman and Tom Wilkinson deserve blogging?

Of course they do. (Especially the Sisko.) But I didn't.

I read very few blogs that don't update regularly. Of those I do read, it's usually because I know the blogger personally. Otherwise, why bother? I did seem to be building a small readership of non-family members this last time, but that's vanished with my unannounced sabbatical.

Oh, well. I'm writing this for my own benefit, and not other people's. Part of the reason I vanished was because I went ahead and shelled out twenty bucks for decent screenwriting software, and focused on writing that for a while. (Also, there were occasional bouts of doing my job.) Then I spent some time re-doing the design of the site, again. The old design was incompatible with Mozilla Firefox, the web browser I've started using. Since you probably use Internet Explorer, this re-design meant nothing to you, and has in fact resulted in a poorer quality design. To say nothing of the fact that I don't like blogs that switch up their design all the time. But it's allowed me to stretch my skills in coding with Cascading Style Sheets, so it's been good for me. And who is this blog here for?

Yes, that's right. It's all about me. Selfish critter, ain't I?

The Smarter Than He Looks Award
Goes to Jonah Goldberg, who recently said this:
The Washington Post's Dana Milbank quoted me as saying Harriet Miers fits the dictionary definition of "crony," as if it was a stinging rebuke of the White House. In reality, it was merely a factual statement.
Well, I'll skip the prerequisite "definition of 'is'" joke. The rest of the article is well worth reading: it's probably the best defense of the Miers nomination that anyone can make and keep their dignity.

Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Ann Coulter: Still Crazy
For reasons passing explanation, I ended up at AnnCoulter.com earlier today, despite the fact that she's crazy. Two paragraphs into the top post on her blog and it's quite clear she's still crazy.
In 2002, Bush backed liberal Richard Riordan in the Republican gubernatorial primary in California against conservative Bill Simon. This triggered a series of events that culminated in Arnold Schwarzenegger becoming the governor of California. [In much the same way that Fox torpedoing Firefly led to Joss Whedon getting his own movie.] ...

If [Rep. Katherine] Harris were as pathetic as the typical Republican supported by Bush, she would have defied the law during the 2000 election crisis and proclaimed Gore the winner just to get the media to love her. Gore would be president now, and Harris would have her own show on MSNBC. I'd be storing away all my summer burkas and, accompanied by a male relative, taking my winter burkas to the dry cleaners to be freshened up...

Karl Rove is Bob Shrum with a good cause.
Ow, my brain.

Country Roads©
The latest from the Mountain State:
Rep. Shelley Moore Capito said today she will not challenge Sen. Robert Byrd next year for a U.S. Senate seat, but instead will try to keep her high-profile position in the House of Representatives
So, without wanting to sound flippant, Robert Byrd just won an unprecedented ninth term in the Senate. (Of course, all predictions regarding Byrd must have an accompanying proviso to the effect that there may be peremptory shuffling off of the mortal coil.) Shelley (at right, thinking "usually Ted Kennedy is the one staring at my boobs") must have read my suggestion that she wait until Byrd dies and avoid a bare-knuckle brawl on the national stage right now. Well, either that or she's simply not stupid. I'm going to assume it's the former in order to pump up my ego.

Meanwhile, over at GOP central, we can only assume that Ken Mehlman and Elizabeth Dole are re-evaluating where they want to put their campaign cash. Yay!

Kakistocracy©
At right, Abdul Salam Al Kubaisi, from the Association of Muslim Scholars, an insurgent-sympathetic group, with Muqtada al Sadr. Kubaisi recently declared that Sunnis will "all reject the constitution and we will say 'No' to it no matter what happens."

Spencer Ackerman wonders:
After the Sunni minority says no the constitution--and especially after they say no and it passes anyway--what do you suppose the likelihood is that they'll remain in the political process?
Prediction: across Iraq, Sunni's celebrate the passage of the constitution with fireworks of the fifty caliber variety.

Monday, October 03, 2005
Miers Who?
So: I've mentioned the Miers nomination—as has everyone else on the face of the planet. I was sanguine about the thing, pointing out that a lack of judicial experience is hardly a disqualifier. Harry Reid seemed to be thinking similar thoughts, saying her lack of judicial experience is a "plus, not a minus."

Well, she may not have any minuses, but she no one seems to be coming up with many pluses, either. Democracy Guy titles his post "Supreme Court? Crony Time!!!" calls Miers an "insulting choice" and demands her work on the Texas Lottery Commission be gone over "with a fine toothed comb."

He's absolutely right. Democracy Guy hails from Ohio, and the recent shenanigans in Columbus ought to be proof enough of that for anyone. (No, really, go ahead and ask Bob Taft about his coins.)

Well, it just might get such a reception. Here's The Carpetbagger predicting media skepticism:
The conventional wisdom is that a nominee's narrative is largely set within the first 48 hours or so. With this in mind, by sometime Wednesday, the mainstream media will probably be reporting a) "Harriet Miers, who's nomination has been well received on the Hill," or b) "Harriet Miers, who's limited record has made her nomination more controversial than John Roberts'."

At this point, after about six hours, the latter is slowly taking root —— and Dems haven't had to lift a finger...
Well, it's impossible for me not to roll my eyes at "here's the situation six hours in," but he may well be right.

In any case, if the Democratic party hasn't settled on any sort of response, the conservative media has very quickly emitted a collective, unequivocal, uncompromising "eh."

That's a quote, by the way. Jonah Goldberg is saying that "the chatter around here and the new editorial all echo my basic feelings: Eh." David Frum calls Miers "an unforced error" and would much rather see Harriet's dad or that one senator with the same last name. (No, not Harriet Miers the nominee. A different Harriet. That is what's called an in-joke.) Bill Kristol is "disappointed, depressed, and demoralized," and John Hinderaker, Kathryn Lopez and Johnathan Adler all use one of those three words. Anklebitingpundits observe "Ugh. This is what we fought for?" Ramesh Ponnuru says Miers is "not as bad as Caligula putting his horse in the Senate," (a position with which I am inclined to agree) and suggests the following question for her nomination hearing:
Prior to this year, in the course of your legal career have you ever been involved in any Supreme Court litigation? Have you ever been consulted about such litigation? Has it ever occurred to anyone to consult you about it?
So, wow, way to fire up the base. Goldberg elaborates:
at first blush, what bothers me more is the political calculation here. Bush could very much use a brisk confirmation battle right now. His base is forgetting why he should be supported. Confirmation battles over big ideas are clarifying in ways that are good for the public and good for a president whose principles are getting blurry. The Miers pick comes along at precisely the wrong moment. Bush is saying "trust me" at exactly the time when conservatives want to be reassured they can trust him. The last thing he needs right now is to dip into his house credit one more time.

Bush has a history of running against the wind of his strongest critics, which is one of the things I love about the guy. For example, people said Bush was too unilateral and hostile to the international community, so he appointed John Bolton. But, either by accident or design, this time around he seems bent on countering a different kind of criticism. He's been getting beaten -- somewhat unfairly -- for his alleged cronyism of late. This appointment seems like the Bolton approach; "Oh yeah, you think I'm into cronyism? Well here's my former personal lawyer from Texas!"
All of which seems fairly spot-on to me, so here's to Washington's conservative pundits for getting things together pretty quickly. It's quite likely the Democrats will be more angry (and and they'll have every right to be, especially if they're from Ohio) but let's give the righties proper respect for getting their first.

Side note: Jonah Goldberg's analysis is the reason I read the conservative blogging at The Corner. Well, that and the Caligula thing.

Side note 2: The San Jose Mercury News gets the "Most Bizarre, Pointless, Cry-For-Help-Style Commentary on Harriet Miers" award. Congrats to them.

Kakistocracy©
The New York Times is reporting that the EU has a tentative agreement ready for allowing Turkey membership. Turkish media is reporting that their foreign minister has signed on to some sort of preliminatry deal—which the Turkish government is denying.

Perhaps the deal is the sort of half-membership Austria's been pushing for, and the Turks don't want to look like they're bending over for the EU, and specifically ex-USSR countries who's EU memberships still have the plastic wrapping on.

Either way, this is going to get buried in the Miers nomination. Too bad, too: where Turkey goes the next 20 years is critically important to the security of the West. But instead of that making the front page of the Times, we get to hear about how Harriet Miers has never even been a judge. Well, that's not a bad thing, as Akiba Covitz and Mark Tushnet argue convincingly in this week's New Republic.