home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
The Trail© 1000 Words© Where's Osama? Kakistocracy© 1000 Words© Looking Into the Future--Boldly! The Trail© W&I© 1000 Words© Sunday's Headlines©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Monday, November 08, 2004
Kakistocracy©
One of the few bright spots in the Senate next year: term limits are depriving Orrin Hatch of his chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee.
In line to replace Hatch is Pennsylvania Republican Arlen Specter. He often appears liberal because he has to sit next to Rick Santorum. USA Today reports: Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, in comments last week, noted that Senate Democrats have staged filibusters to block confirmation votes on federal judge nominees who oppose abortion and most likely would do so again. I would expect the president to be mindful of that, he said. Some GOP conservatives took that as a warning that Specter would keep such nominations from a vote and said Specter should be denied the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he is in line to assume next year.I used to watch a lovely Aussie comedy called The Games. It was a fake documentary about the bureaucrats trying to organize the 2000 Summer Olympics. They had a running gag: if the minister for the Olympics expressed his complete support for someone, that person was effectively unemployed and it was safe to lay claim on his or her parking spot. Robert Novak (yuck) launched the opening broadside against Specter. Remember, any hint of disloyalty to President Bush is proof of treachery to Novak, and anyone proven guilty must be shown to be entirely diabolical—or at least in league with the devil. Novak concludes that "Specter's and John Kerry's positions [on abortion] are indistinguishable." Assuming that Specter cannot and will not make a flat commitment of support [for Bush's judicial nominees], the prospect of his imminent chairmanship poses tests for two ambitious Republicans. Will Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, eyeing the White House, marshal his power to block Specter's ascension? Will Senate Republican Conference Chairman Santorum, after alienating his base by backing Specter against serious conservative opposition in this year's Pennsylvania primary, turn against his colleague?Did you catch how quick that happened? The suggestion that Specter might not give unqualified support to Bush's nominees right now—before we even know who they are—and Novak jumps right to figuring out how to get him out of there. Absolute personal loyalty to President Bush. Robert Novak demands it. A final frightening thought: [Majority Leader Bill Frist] is considering asking the full Republican Conference to waive term limits for Hatch. I love the comment about Novak. I am waiting for the Bob Novak-William Cristol sex scandal. Hell, lets get all the conservative pundits in on this, think of the pictures, Tucker in his little bow tie, and nothing else. My god, its almost as frigteningly pornographic as the cover of an Ann Coulter book!Post a Comment |