home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
50 in 05© The Round Up Triple Espresso Kakistocracy© Kakistocracy© A Good Weekend Click Here!© On The Train... The World Bank Because I Said So!
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Timeline
My post on my USDA internship, below, is nearly two weeks behind reality. In fact, I have nearly finished the internship I was writing about. I also have two nearly complete posts on what has happened recently in the works, including at Bot Mitzvah and several 50 in 05© posts. I urge all my readersboth of youto pretend that I finish writing in a timely fashion and simply post from an alternate universe that is several weeks behind your own.
In any case, Quilly notes: The Democrats bellowed with joy at the poll numbers which showed that many Republicans opposed the action by Bush and Congress to intervene in the Schiavo case. They see it as a split in the party. It is not. That Libertarian streak has been in the party for quite sometime. The glue that holds the Republican Party together is the fear of what the hard leftists in the Democrat Party will do if the leadership on the GOP is not supported.While, obviously, I think Quilly's hard leftists are less scaryslightlythan their counterparts on the lunatic fringe of the conservative movement, he is correct in that fear of the liberals is the strength of the Republican party. It will be difficult for Democrats to counter those fears of a Deaniac-spanwed Apocalypsesome real, most imaginedby presenting the positive alternative of a fiscally liberal, culturally libertarian America. And while the nut-ball conservatives are equally as dangerous as the freak-show liberals, the GOP is simply superior to the Democratic party in fear-mongering. Both these things could change, the first as charismatic and non-insane leaders emerge in the Democratic partyinsert obligatory kissing of Barak Obama's ass herethe second as the Democrats aquire their own highly capable, morally bankrupt, fear-mongering sleaze-bag politicos, like the apocalyptic Dr. Dean, whose skill I admire more and whose ethics I regard less highly with each move he makes. He was a wise choice for a party chair, although he would be more at home, I think, in Tammany Hall. What will not, unfortunately, change, is America's reflexive revulsion at the sight of real debate on substantive issues. We haven't had anything even appraoching that since the birth of the man who truly ushered in the Apocalypse, at least when it comes to American politics, William Randolph Hearst. By the way, all of my Utah-based readers should mark out March 31sttommorrowto attend this: A Little Less Conversation... Republican "policy" IS more fear based than Democratic "policy" which is to their advantage. Fear is simply a stronger (more intense) emotion than hope and likely to evoke more work and votes. I realize this is oversimplified but I am at work and want to check out the big PCMC sign in front of the hospital which someone knocked over with a car a little while ago. Pretty exciting, huh? For Utah that is, GUYPost a Comment |