You know, it's satisfying to finally try to nail Karl Rove on something, and it's fun—scary fun, but fun—to watch the GOP spin machine try to pass the buck. But there are important things getting lost in the noise; here's TNR on one example:

What does a "competent tribunal" look like? The D.C. Circuit's Court of Appeals has an interesting take. According to today's ruling, which gives a green light to the military commissions being used to try Guantanamo detainees, competency doesn't have to do with judges having legal experience or knowing how many articles are in the Geneva Convention. It doesn't require that a defendant be advised of the evidence against him or provided the right to independent appeal. It doesn't relate to strict standards for admissible evidence--in fact, hearsay and statements obtained under coercion are a-okay. In fact, really the only thing a competent tribunal needs is three commissioned officers, at least one of whom is ranked above captain. And, having those, says the court, "the military commission is such a tribunal." Release the kangaroos!

Too bad Scotty has left the building. But I dont think of him as dead...he has just been beamed up..."Live Long and Prosper Scotty." GUY

Posted by  Anonymous @ 6:36 PM

 

Post a Comment