home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
How's Your Journalistic Objectivity These Days?New... W&I©"Until death do us part" sounds very romantic ... Through the Looking-Glass- I was there for a whole... W&I©You see control can never be a means to any pr... The Last DaysChris Lehmann provides an insightful ... But The Working-Class Have Jobs AlreadyIn a Newswe... A Bit More Seriously Than They Deserve, EvenIf Has... W&I©(The segment formerly known as Witty & Insight... Witty and Insightful©This is a large part of the a... Notes from the AbyssThe report on the 800th MP bri...
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Tuesday, May 11, 2004
The John-John TicketAndrew Sullivan argues in The New Republic for a Kerry-McCain ticket:There is one obvious possible result of the Abu Ghraib fiasco, and it affects the presidential election profoundly: It has, I think, made the possibility of a Kerry-McCain ticket much more imaginable. In fact, in some ways, a Kerry-McCain pairing would be an almost painfully appropriate response to the recent loss of confidence both in the war and in the Kerry candidacy. Such a bipartisan ticket remains highly unlikely, but recent events make it less so.There is an excellent case for a Kerry-McCain ticket. There's recent support from Joe Biden and a Boston Globe article that was picked up by that old Hickville Dispach© reliable, The Salt Lake Tribune. But there's an elephant in the room: McCain has repeatedly said he does not want to run. Kevin Drum speculates that McCain is quietly talking terms with Kerry. Well, here's my thoughts on this: The only reason a Kerry/McCain ticket might be unbeatable is the fact that McCain will be publicly calling on reneging on his promise not to run. However, remember that this need not be a zero-sum game. Sen. McCain has a third option, other than simply joining a Kerry ticket or not joining it, and it's an option that solves a lot of problems for him: issuing a public ultimatum. While McCain's party loyalty has always been the main obstacle to his joining the Kerry ticket, he has a more practical reason to remain a Republican s well. It makes him much more valuable to the Democrats. Remember what happened to Jim Jeffords after he formally left the Republican party? While Jeffords faded into obscurity, McCain has remained a major figure since his failed run against Bush four years ago. (This is not mere political machination: a politicians reputation defines what he or she can accomplish.) While the situation is not the same, it's similar, and simply saying "this national crisis demands that [McCain] put country ahead of party and serve" sounds, unfortunately, like an excuse. That's why he should issue an ultimatum. "Mr. President, for the sake of the country, you must dismiss Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense. If you do not, I will rethink my decision not to run for Vice President with John Kerry." This sets out a clear line, that, when crossed, will allow McCain to join the Kerry ticket. If Bush does fire Rumsfeld, McCain will be hated in the White House and by the GOP orthodox, but independents and moderates will respect his ability to get things done by taking on comers from both parties. Which is pretty much what we have now. If Bush refuses, yes, some conservatives will lambast him and Ann Coulter will no doubt call it the "John-John ticket." That's something we can't avoid. But this way, when McCain appeals to moderates with the message, "I had to join this ticket, my conscience demanded it," he'll mean it. |