home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Leaving Las Ve--er, BaghdadAndy Sullivan blogs:The... Marriage DayI've been sitting here for some time t... More McCainI put in my two cents on the idea of a ... Good News IIPerhaps it's not a momentary lapse. E... But What If They Had Clothes On?The NYTimes accoun... How I Live Now
Perhaps it's a momentary lapse, bu... Gersh's Charts
These charts are not my creation, ... Hickville Dispach©
Hillcrest High School students... And I'm Just West of There, Too.Virginia has just ... The Chief of Shi--er, Staff(And did Card actually ...
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Saturday, May 22, 2004
W&I©I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such: because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no Form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well-administred; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administred for a Course of Years and can only end in Despotism as other Forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other. Benjamin Franklin, 1789 Benjamin Franklin here smacks of what Andy Sullivan calls "a text-book case in the virtues and merits of today's academic elite. They [in this case, blogger and history prof. Juan Cole] can marshall great scholarship and knowledge; but their ideological extremism taints it all." What he calls ideological extremism I would prefer to all terminal pessimism. Or, more accurately, Hunter Thompson's Disease. In any case, yes, I think the academic elite often come down hard on America, especially history professors; but it is for the same reason Franklin had his doubts about our constitution. To the layman, it is self-evident that America's founding document is a blueprint for a good government, a noble thing. To someone who has studied history, it is also self-evident that our country will eventually collapse anyway, because that is what happens to nations. Just as bad gives way to good, good gives way to bad, and it is possible we are witnessing the sunset. Another point: we all have our biases, and they are almost always crippling. I do, Andrew Sullivan does, and Susan Sontag does. In fact, if you follow the link to Andy's blog, above, you have to scroll past a post on why Susan Sontag is a communist to get to the entry on academic elites. No, not kidding; and entry on how Susan Sontag is a communist. Now, I should point out here that Susan Sontag is a communist, but Sullivan, in an example of bias, writes: Sontag is urging on America "convulsive" social change to produce "new versions of human nature." Lenin, anyone? No wonder she has found members of al Qaeda to be more moral than American soldiers.Well, perhaps all of America's enemies are pinkos, be they Isamo-Fascists or Susan Sontag or, well, actual pinkos. But I wonder: is Juan Cole is a communist? A final point on Juan Cole: His blog has almost the same name as mine and the same design I used to use. This, I assure you all, is a complete coincidence and not a communist conspiracy. |