home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Last Note: A Laundry List The Understatement of the Week Award Happy Tsagaan Sar Peach Cobbler-ish Fax-ed Up Beyond All Recognition Ayatollah Ironic Big Brother Watch Stormin' Orrin Lunch Hour
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Kakistocracy©
A few months ago a paper in Denmark called Jyllands Posten published 12 cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammed, despite the fact that the Koran forbids depictions of said prophet. A firestorm was set off, as the Daily Mail reports:
PARIS -- After fiery protests in the Middle East, a near-total Arab boycott of Danish products, a storm of diplomatic protests and death threats against its journalists, a Copenhagen-based newspaper apologized for publishing provocative caricatures of Islam's Prophet, Mohammed...Naturally, the first thing I wanted to do was see the cartoons. The Daily Mail article described them as "drawn by different artists who portrayed Mohammed in the same broad strokes that many Western newspapers and magazines have come to use as shorthand for terrorists." A couple of the cartoons are exactly that. For example:Way to go, Kurt Westergaard. On the other hand, Poul Erik Poulsen's caricature was hardly a caricature:Wow, doesn't the prophet look bloodthirsty? And then there's Bob Katzennelsonit wasn't Muhammed his cartoon was taking a shot at:So those are the cartoons that have sparked massive boycotts, protests, bomb threats, recalled diplomats...this is what prompted Bill Clinton himself to wonder "Are we heading to replace anti-Semitism with anti-Islam?" This!Offensive? Maybe. A violation of Koranic by-laws? Sure. But the new Mein Kampf? What the hell? We knowknowthat this doesn't happen when people make fun of Jesus; nor when people violate the Second Commandment. So if our right to free speech supersedes the highly unlikely claims of a 2,000-year-old book, why in Allah's name is it subservient to the equally dubious restrictions in a 1,400-year-old sequel? We don't have to REPLACE anti-Semitism with anti-Islam. We can just add it on. Clinton underestimate the capacity of humans to hate. - UT lover How many anti-Semetic (Jewish semites, not Arab semites) cartoons would you guess have been published in Arab newspapers in the past few year? For that matter how many have been published that Christians would find offensive. - Just Wondering in UT I regret to inform that the CoffeeGarden on 9th and 9th is no longer open due to a lease issue. Don't know whether or where it will reopen as yet. - GUYPost a Comment |