home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Last Time in AmericaHere's a blast from the past: ... W&I©Negro children need neither segregated schools... Film SchoolI just saw Troy, a film with so much of... More Demographics? Must You?I'm afraid I must.
T... Lies, Damn Lies & DemographicsNot long ago, I ment... Oh, dear...There are some things even the Medium L... On SomethingUpon rereading, my earlier entry on An... 'Unhinged' is the Word I Was Looking ForMatthew Yg... W&I©I agree to this Constitution with all its faul... Leaving Las Ve--er, BaghdadAndy Sullivan blogs:The...
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Friday, June 04, 2004
Is It Good for a Peace-Time Nation?Sullivan, on Bush's Colorado speech:The president appeared yet again divorced from anything vaguely representing reality. That is not a good thing for a nation at war.Actually, Andy is having a bad day: Here's a revealing sentence from National Review's profile of Roger Simon, ex-lefty blogger: "[When] it comes to social policy, he continues to lean hard to the left. 'I'm very liberal on social issues: pro-gay marriage, pro-choice, separation of church and state,' he says. 'I think racism and sexism are the greatest evils in the world.'" So allowing women to choose to seek an abortion is now a "hard left" position? And encouraging gay couples to have stable relationships is "hard left"? And being deeply concerned about racism and sexism is "hard left"? I won't even touch "separation of church and state." But I will notice that this assertion comes at a time when Karl Rove is deliberately trying to involve church congregations directly in Bush's re-election effort. Disturbing.Can't say I blame him. Balanced budgets are "hard left" now, too. So's putting things in "quotation marks." He continunes, bashing Stanley Kurtz (something I did sooner, if less viciously, and with fewer Robin Williams refrences): You can, in fact, draw a direct connection between the liberalization of marriage laws in Liechtenstein and this collapse in marriage in Japan. And the turning point came at exactly the moment that Richard Hatch won "Survivor," putting another nail in the coffin of heterosexual marriage. Secular humanist skeptics will no doubt quibble that there is no such thing as gay marriage in Japan, that Japan is, in fact, a deeply homophobic society. But can they prove no connection with Holland's slide toward Gommorrah? Hasn't greater Western tolerance of homosexuals seeped through in Japan? Didn't the "Bird Cage" do pretty well over there? You have been warned. Unless you amend the American constitution, the Yellow-Lavender Peril will be here before you know it.I think I now officially quallify as Andrew Sullivan's bitch—— er, schill. But most bloggers are. :::spasms, disconnects::: |