home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Chemo for Capitalism Who's Sexiest: Elizabeth Edwards or Theresa Heinz ... Still Friday Friday Night How to Piss Off the Secret Service Sullivan New York, New YorkTNR's Ryan Lizza was at an inter... There Are Flashbacks...As the GOP Convention opens... W&I©(Or, why we love The Daily Show)You'd be surpr... Fear and Loathing of George W. BushSome pictures o...
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
A Well-Managed FreedomReported in The Washington Post:MOSCOW, Sept. 13 -- President Vladimir Putin announced plans Monday for a "radically restructured" political system that would bolster his power by ending the popular election of governors and independent lawmakers, moves he portrayed as a response to this month's deadly seizure of a Russian school.Next to Tony Blair, Vladimir Putin is President Bush's biggest ally in the War on Terror. To make the world safe. For managed democracy. The US Justice Department is also making the world safe for managed democracy. The Memory Hole has unearthed a disturbing case of black-marker overdosing at the DOJ. The justice department is allowed to redact (cover up with black marker) court rulings in ACLU cases, among others. DOJ recently blacked out the following words from United States v. US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 407 US 297, 314 (1972). It's a bit difficult figure out what part of a 1972 Supreme Court decision could need to be classified, but let's give Aschroft the benefit of the doubt here. No, let's not. Here's what the DOJ blacked out: The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent.Don't mind the Department of Justice. They're just managing our democracy. |