home
In Soviet Russia, blog reads you.
recent posts
Kakistocracy© 1000 Words© W&I© Kakistocracy© C&C The Reading Room Trust No One Technology Advances! W&I© Snoopy Dance©
CONTACT
ARCHIVES
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006
Support Structure
|
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Kakistocracy©
Here's something from the things to lookforward to this October:
WASHINGTON, May 2 - The Supreme Court agreed today to consider a case involving national defense, concepts of patriotism and free speech and, not incidentally, billions of dollars in federal money.This demonstrates, in it's own odd little way, how mild the tensions are between the services and the Ivory Tower set. What can I say? It's difficult to picture some Air National Guard recruiter making the rounds of Kent State. Of course, I don't want to be seen as drawing a comparison between the Iraq War and Vietnam. Especially since the law schools in the case are, in the court documents at least, opposed to Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and not the war. I merely wanted to suggest that the animosity between the college world and the military world is not what it once was, and this court case will reflect that. This particular clash in the culture war is likely to go relatively unnoticed, especially if the Jackson verdict comes in during October, or if the war takes a turn for the worse. Of course it'll get a few days in the limelight and go into everyone's lists of greivances, but it won't seem earth-shaking. Not at first, anyway. But there is an important decision being made here: just how many rights do we now invest in our Armed Forces? Universities are things, not people, and have no right to free speech; that's why those attempts to ban those affirmative action bakesales#&148; are so much more egregious and serious than the sales themselves, which are really rather half-baked. But remember: the government has even less right to free speech than the universities. These are not people going to universities praising the military. These are government employees doing a job for which they are paid good money by the federal government. So while the rights of the individully nearly always trumps the rights of a university, the rights of the government do not. The government should argue that military recruiters perform a vital service to the public and therefore the universities right to bar them should be overridden. If they argue that the universities have no right to bar the recruiters, then they're admitting that the recruiters do not, in fact, perform a vital public service. Or, worse, if they merely claim that the military recruiters perform a vital service, but don't explain what that service isbecause it's obious, and if you don't get it, you're one of them, Ann Coulter will saythen you'll know you're really being fed a line of bullshit. Don't even mentions A. C.'s name; she is too far beneath you. In fact, she needs to rise in order to be beneath contempt. GUYPost a Comment |